1. ddobbs
  2. Economic policy as genetic diversification

Economic policy as genetic diversification

By ddobbs on March 3, 2009.

Sort of.

Economist Edward Glasser, via Andrew Sullivan, makes it clear why they call static old industries "dinosaurs." This seems dead-on to me:

Across cities, there is a strong connection between an abundance of small firms and local growth. The last thing that the government should be doing is propping up big declining firms. Real innovations are far more likely to come from someone%u2019s garage, which is where Chester Carlson came up with the Xerox machine during the Great Depression.

The Big Three automakers pose real policy problems. The government is already on the hook for their huge pension liabilities. Vast layoffs will make the recession worse. I am not arguing for complete laissez-faire, but an open-ended commitment to this industry, or any other, is pure folly. Growth requires change, not binding our country to declining industries.

Tags
economics

More like this

Tobacco Tactics in the Battle Over BPA

As evidence about the health risks associated with smoking accumulated, the tobacco industry responded by funding its own research, which concluded that cigarettes aren't so bad after all.

Uncovering Tobacco Industry Strategies - You Can Help

Over the past few years, millions of formlerly secret internal documents from the tobacco industry have been made public and helped public health advocates learn how Big Tobacco deceived lawmakers and the public about smoking's health risks.

US industrial sand production increases dramatically, yet industry says worker protection too costly

By Elizabeth Grossman

History of the Swedish Boardgame Market

Karl Olausson has just submitted his Bachelor's thesis in history: a study of the post-WW2 Swedish boardgame market. The material he's used is largely interviews with people in our country's boardgame business.