Troublesome Worms Denude Forests in U.S. Great Lakes Region: Scientific American

A European nightcrawler, ready to make trouble

Eartthworms, it seems, are the new decimator, at least in Midwestern hardwood forests . Scientific American has the story:

Long considered a gardener's friend, earthworms can loosen and aerate the soil. But the story is different in the Great Lakes region. The last Ice Age wiped out native earthworms 10,000 years ago, and ever since the Northeast forest has evolved without the crawlers, Hale says. But now earthworms are back, a product of fishers who toss their worms into the forest, of off-road vehicles and lumber trucks that carry them in the treads of their tires, and of people who bring in mulch--and any worms that might be in it--from other areas.

The worms then much away the 2-5-inch thick organic leaf layer that these forests are used to having.

As a result, some northern hardwood forests that once had a lush understory now have but a single species of native herb and virtually no tree seedlings. Evidently, earthworms change the forest soils from a fungal to a bacterial-dominated system, which speeds up the conversion of leaf detritus to mineral compounds and thereby potentially robs plants of organic nutrients.

The worms also apparently mess with the salamander population, as many of them are too big for young salamanders to eat.

This is a strange story, to be sure, and as I've not previously heard anything on it, I frankly wonder how widespread a problem it is. Apparently we'll soon learn more, as the University of Minnesota ecologist featured in the story, Cindy Hale, recently got a 3-year, $397,500 federal grant to see how widespread and serious the problem really is. This strikes me as the sort of study that science 'skeptics' like John McCain might ridicule -- $400,000 to study earthworms! But if they affect the forests the way described in this story, the impact on the forest-based industries could be large indeed.

Worth reading the whole (fairly short) story at SciAm.

Hat tip: James Hathaway

Disclosure dept: I sometimes write for Scientific American and am a contributing editor for Scientific American Mind (a nonpaying distinction).

More like this

Pytoplankton gets some of its nutrients from the dust that settles on the ocean surface. Unfortunately, some of this dust, owing to human caused pollution, is toxic to phytoplankton. Adina Paytan, a marine scientist at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and her colleagues have found that…
Gardeners like to compete with each other over who has the worst soil. You wouldn't think we'd be proud of this, but what can I say, we're a strange bunch. One will argue for his hard clay, baked in the sun, another for her sand, without a trace of organic matter. I've got my own candidate for…
Walking through a streamside copse of eastern hemlock in the ancient Appalachians is revealing for several reasons. First, the sheer size and age of these virgin stands can be humbling - at 45+ meters high, one tree may have been alive for more than 600 years. Second, a closer look at the forest's…
While some dismiss the Midwest as "flyover states" and locals decry a brain drain that admittedly I am part of, non-human species seem to be arriving in the area in droves. Here's a pictorial tour of some of the exotic species that have recently settled in the area. The yellow flower in the…

People here in Ontario (at least those in the know) have been concerned about this for years. For those of us for whom salamanders represented the pinnacle of evolution the loss of our forest floors is a tragedy.

see here.

Unfortunately, I'm not confident that we will ever find a solution to this problem.

All part of the great extinction event currently ongoing, caused by mankind tranferring species all around the world, where they become pests.

Earthworms do not actually eat the leaves or decaying matter. They eat the micro-organisms that breakdown the matter. They eat harmful micro-organisms too, which is beneficial for the soil.