Walking on water

These installations (or more precisely drawings on the floor and ceiling) take advantage of our use of textures to perceive a third dimension/depth out of monocular cues. I'm curious how effective they are from different viewpoints. Perhaps there are some accidental views that make the texture completely boring instead of completely cool.

Here's some great examples:
i-587d9311957743701acff6a27b41ade4-waveroom.jpg

i-bc77253a4bfa6b22899e1b786aa201fd-waveroom2.jpg

Check out bookofjoe for some more examples.

-Via Neatorama-

Tags

More like this

I frequently hear people imply, if they don't state directly, that two working eyes are required for depth perception. This is surprising because with a moment's reflection, it's easy to see that there are depth cues that don't require both eyes. In fact, out of the many, many cues to depth that…
[First published on 1/22/05 at the old blog.] Recall V.S. Ramachandran's 10 principles of art. Peak shift Perceptual Grouping and Binding Contrast Isolation Perceptual problem solving Symmetry Abhorrence of coincidence/generic viewpoint Repetition, rhythm and orderliness Balance Metaphor In the…
A version of this post was originally published on my Wordpress blog on March 15, 2010. Click the archives image to see the original post. Most animals, at some point in their day-to-day lives, face the same problem. After they've gone out in search of food, they need to find their way home. But…
As you all know, I love visual illusions, and this may be one of my favorites. This picture is pretty small (go here for a bigger version), but you should be able to figure out what's going on by watching it for a moment. Notice that as the face flips over, you briefly see the concave surface of…

I wouldn't think there would be a particular viewpoint that would destroy the illusion, but a moving viewpoint would.

By Benton Jackson (not verified) on 20 Apr 2011 #permalink

I wouldn't think there would be a particular viewpoint that would destroy the illusion, but a moving viewpoint would.