Venter and Gibson on the Synthetic Genome

There is an interesting and very thoughtful piece by Craig Venter and Daniel Gibson in today's Wall Street Journal going through what their breakthrough is and what it isn't, where they see the project going in the future, and why public discussion is important:

[Previous genetic engineers] did not create life in a test tube, nor did we create life from scratch. We transformed existing life into new life. We also did not design and build a new chromosome from nothing. Rather, using only digitized information, we synthesized a modified version of the naturally occurring Mycoplasma mycoides genome. The result is not an "artificial" life form. It is a very real, self-replicating cell that most microbiologists would be unable to readily distinguish from the naturally occurring counterpart without the aid of DNA sequencing.

Via @edyong209

More like this

Get in the mood for this bit of news, the synthesis of an artificial organism by Craig Venter's research team. Here's the equivalent of that twitching hand of Frankenstein's monster: Those are two colonies of Mycoplasma mycoides, their nucleoids containing entirely synthesized DNA. You can tell…
I've been following the reaction to the synthesis of a new life form by the Venter lab with some interest and amusement. There have been a couple of common directions taken, and they're generally all wrong. This is not to say that there couldn't be valid concerns, but that the loudest complaining…
The reaction to the Venter Institute's synthetic genome transplantation has been decidedly mixed. Is this the beginning of something new and wonderful, the ability to really design organisms from scratch? Is it something more sinister, the beginning of a dark era where techno-corporate (or…
What do these three quotations have in common? Hint: it lives in a petri dish. "To live, to err, to fall, to triumph, and to recreate life out of life." -- James Joyce "What I cannot build, I cannot understand." -- Richard Feynman "See things not as they are, but as they might be." -- from…

This topic is going to be a disaster in public affairas due to the 'ethicists'. It seems like you can just sit and stare at a wall after someone makes a grand discovery and then stop their work by thinking of consequences which may or may not happen. As if the riddles of the universe come by sitting there twiddling your thumbs, rather than doing.
Reminds me of this quote that comes from a t shirt.
Philosophers and talk be damned.
Let's just start doing fun stuff with it.

http://images5.cafepress.com/product/35495545v1_350x350_Front.jpg