He's been nominated for some category or other in the Koufaxes—I think it's "Most consistently creative misspellings of a blogger's name"—but no one has voted for him yet. Somebody out there must appreciate philosophy and science and is willing to toss him a bone, right?
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Now that the 2006 Weblog Awards are over (and congratulations to all of my favourites for wins or good showing), we are all warmed up and ready for the Real Deal - the Koufaxes!
First, and most importantly, go over to Wampum and hit their PayPal button (on the left top side-bar), or their Amazon.…
In a private communication, Sciencewoman asks:
Just out of curiosity, how have you been able to blog under your real name? Has your department been supportive? Are you post-tenure and immune from some of the pressures that the rest of us feel? Or is it that a philosophy department views outreach/…
Now that 2009 is about to kick into gear, I have to look back at 2008 one last time to acknowledge one failure. As a backdrop to that failure, I note that the antivaccine propaganda site Age of Autism has posted a series of their People of the Year "awards" for 2008, including, antivaccine…
This week, the National Review Online's media blogger revealed the secret identity of dKos blogger Armando, who says that this unwanted decloaking probably means he will no longer blog.
While I'm not heavy into the political end of the blogosphere (until someone can provide me with more than 24…
Rats! I just voted for Aetiology in that category...perhaps we can nominate him for most abusive of a Panda (the way he treats porr Prof Steve Steve should be a crime). I can relate, though because no one has voted for me either...
Yeah, that's a rough category -- it's like there are about as many nominees as there will be voters. It's one where we should have more than one vote.
Who are you again? The name's familiar...
If I hadn't up and voted for myself in that category, I'd do it in a flash (for that profile pic alone).
Actually, PZ, since GrrlScience isn't eligible for Best New Blog, you could reassign your vote in that category ...
(Or, was it one of those principled/throwing-your-vote-away kinda moves of which we on the left are so fond?)
That's GrrlScientist, of course.
I'm confused--isn't John's blog older than Jan 1, 2005? His archives date back to 2004--were they imported from somewhere else?
People actually vote in these things?
Tara, shhh... I'm hoping they are using some alternate value of "New" here...