Blechh. I feel bad for the frog.

i-bab0cd126ce6a0b7294d1b450a080520-kissfrog.jpg

(via Feministing)

Tags

More like this

Kate reviews the latest paper by Ellen Ketterson et al. and since she did it so well, I decided not to do it myself, as it comes too close to my own stuff... Mountain Top Removal? See why this is not a good idea. Two conservatives, two views on environmentalism (and no, I will not go into details…
From feministing.com via Ana
So the notion that human semen may act as an antidepressant is rearing its semi-flaccid head again. Broadsheet from Salon.com (May, 2007) asks are you addicted to semen? Someday they'll have a patch for that. Dr. Gordon G. Gallup theorizes (via Feministing) that women have a "chemical dependency…

Is that why Rome conquered France? For birth control? ;)

By Miguelito (not verified) on 07 Mar 2006 #permalink

I'm gonna say that's actually a toad.

I think I speak for the entire religious right when I ask....did it work?

By Onychomys (not verified) on 07 Mar 2006 #permalink

Those "Frenchy's" have all the fun!
Unless you meant the amphibian...........

Attempting to spit into the mouth of a frog would likely bring said female in oral contact with the frog's skin. I remember as a kid another kid getting really sick after putting a frog in his mouth and later being warned that frog as well as toads have chemicals on their skin which we are wise not to ingest. Perhaps one of these chemicals in low doses, such as one might get from attempting to spit in a frogs mouth, might produce a contraceptive affect in a woman's body?

or maybe its just something somebody made up. But contraception are often one of the natural remedies most desired by women in non-industrial populations where local herbal medicine is still practiced.

See, now I heard all sorts of things might happen if you lick a frog, but contraception isn't one of 'em.

"now I heard all sorts of things might happen if you lick a frog, but contraception isn't one of 'em"

Oh, yeah? First imagine you will spend considerable time and effort on something not connected with doing sex, then imagine you will come into contact with a slimy beast, then imagine that you are potentially nauseous from the contact, and now imagine that you have stamina and will left to connect with yet another beast. (Potentially slimy too. :-) Pretty good contraceptive, if you ask me.

By Torbjorn Larsson (not verified) on 07 Mar 2006 #permalink

Yabbut you're missing the possibility that the frog will turn into a handsome prince and then contraception will be practically impossible.

poor froggy? what's worse? spitting into the frog's mouth, or levitating it?

hey, maybe spitting into the mouth of a levitated frog will do something?! that's called the Thomas Edison approach to science: try all possible combinations.

What on earth lead them to that conclusion?

Exactly how much Viagra would it take to arouse your libido if you saw a lady prying open the mouth of a frog and spitting into its open jaws?

Then again.....

It's fairly easy to pry open the mouth of a frog. A little pressure on the two joints'll do it.

Exactly how much Viagra would it take to arouse your libido if you saw a lady prying open the mouth of a frog and spitting into its open jaws?

You know, that is kind of kinky…

Does this mean South Dakota will ban frogs next?

Back in the dark days when so many people fervently believed in ludicrously magical thinking...**

...Er... that is, a long time ago there were lots of one-eyed newts running around, too. They really gave the amphibians hell back then...er...