Darksyde interviews one of those people who convinced me that philosophy actually has something to contribute to our understanding of science (you know, it's sadly true, but science education often belittles the value of trying to puzzle out how we know what we know)—that guy with extremely poor spelling skills, John Willikins Wilkins*. It's a good read.
*Rumors that he bears a familial or temperamental affiliation with a certain mayor of Sunnydale are entirely scurrilous, and therefore well worth spreading.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
You know, I think communicating science is an extremely important enterprise, one that I think scientists need to work at more. That interface with the general public is poorly cobbled together and we often seem to be working in completely different directions, producing a lot of, well, chafing,…
In the comments in response to a post on New Covenant about whether scientists can objectively analyze creationist/ID positions , Matt Powell writes the following, in obvious reference to me and our recent discussion:In some of the recent discussions on morality, religion and Biblical philosophy,…
Someday, I'm going to have to get John Wilkins to explain to me why we still have universities with theology departments, and haven't razed them to the ground and sent the few remaining rational people in them off to sociology and anthropology departments where their work might actually have some…
I was going to try to sleep in this morning but my kid couldn't find her femur---long story. So I figured I might as well brew up a pot of Pal's Special, put up some Irish steel cut oatmeal, and review this weeks insanity.
This has been a rough week for the public's health education. The flu…
Hooray. Philosophy DOES indeed have something to contribute.
What? Bad puns?
I don't think any reasonable, intelligent, educated person would argue with the idea that competent philosophy can benefit any field of inquiry.
As is the case with so many other things, Sturgeon's Law holds approximately true here as well.
Thats what makes US as educated people correct no mattter what:
No matter how much we know, as scientists, we are ALWAYS willing to listen to other groups who may have something intelligent to contribute.
I think thats the main difference between us and the IDiots. We may not have all the answers, but we are willing to listen with a critical ear to all different ideas. Thats the beauty of science and education.
You forgot to mention how mean he is to poor Prof. Steve Steve.
It sounds like Wilkins is simply a historian of biology not too dissimilar to one of my favorite former profs, Lynn Nyhart. Despite his use of philosophical buzz words like "epistemology", I don't see what philosophy has to do with what he does at all (not that I think that's a *bad* thing)
He's a total moron. Ignore him. What would he know anyway. He's Australian.
Although, a comparison with Lynn Nyhart ain't to be sneezed at.
[Jonathon - I am in my own mind both a historian of biology and a philosopher. Others may disagree.]