Score: Clarke 1, Goldstein banned from the sport forevermore

Civilized Celts would send skillful bards to sing satires in great competitions. I applaud the idea of returning to such a literate tradition, but really…a skilled writer who knows something of meter and meaning vs. a clumsy, chattering hack who strings words together in lumpy, clattering arrhythmia? If this were a boxing match, it'd be like pitting Mohammed Ali in his prime against Steve Buscemi with a hangover. It's Bambi sans charm vs. Godzilla with a keyboard. It's the Philadelphia Philharmonic playing over a gurgling drainpipe. Who put together this embarrassing mismatch?

More like this

So, here's a different sort of scenario for an audience-participation post: Imagine that you are in a weirdly well-stocked karaoke bar, and you have to sing a song. There's no way out of it-- if you don't you'll lose your job, rabid squid will eat your family, deranged America-hating terrorists…
PRESS CENTER | PRINTABLE BRACKETS The March weather in California has taken a turn for the beautiful this afternoon, but to chemistry conference fans, the natural beauty of the great outdoors is no match for the beauty of the competitions inside the Chemical Arena. The crowds donned their safety…
Today's the day that Answers In Genesis' museum of ignorance, their "looks like, acts like, smells like, and pretends to be, but decidedly is not a science museum," the Creation Museum opens. I'm horrified about this on many levels. As a scientist, I'm horrified about it just like every other…
Recently, several social psychologists have posited a "Whodunit" system in the brain that's always looking to assign authorship -- either our own or somebody else's -- to actions. Most of the time, it's pretty easy to tell when we've done something, because we have all sorts of signals coming from…

Looks like you hurt Jeff's feelings, PZ: He flinched so hard that he's blaming Coleridge for the bulk of the arrhythmia.

Because -- as we all know -- iambic pentameter isn't a rhythm.

Ah, and of course he has now re-re-edited his post's update to remove his blaming Coleridge. (Editions and redactions which a mouse-click will reverse.)

Ah, and of course he has now re-re-edited his post's update to remove his blaming Coleridge. (Editions and redactions which a mouse-click will reverse.)

Posted by: Chris Clarke | July 1, 2006 03:35 PM

To bad that no one screen capped that, 'cause now he's changed the meter for comedic effect

This seems to be a pattern with Jeffry. When called out about writing in his class notes that The Mona Lisa was painted by Leonardo Da Vinci, it was the people calling him out who were fools because in reality it was a big inside joke between him and his class. I think that he even claimed to have gotten the Heart of Darkness reference he wiffed.

There's always a reason for things that make him foolish.

By Carpbasman (not verified) on 01 Jul 2006 #permalink

If it is just not pathetic enough to attempt to appear "tough" by bashing feminists (in 2006!), it is laughably so to attempt it in poorly metered verse.

What next for low-brow hilarity with a bowtie on... Andrew Dice Clay with symphonic accompaniment?

Steve Buscemi with a hangover

But then, you repeat yourself.