Beaten to the punch

I was thinking of doing something with this paper, but dang it, Omics! Omics! beat me to it. Read it anyway…I suppose there might be some other science in the universe left for me.

More like this

Via my York University Computer Science & Engineering colleague Andrew Eckford, two contrasting blog posts by two different Harvard computer science profs. One has decided to leave academia for greener pastures at Google and the other has decided to stay. First, Matt Welsh on leaving. There is…
tags: math, math for biologists Keith Robison from Omics! Omics! and that fellow Evolgen, with a curious fixation on manatees, have been reminiscing about their college math requirements and speculating on which math courses biologists should take. They've raised some interesting questions that…
I just learned the very sad news that John A. Wheeler has passed away. Wheeler was one of my heroes and inspired me in many ways to be where I am today. I'm buried under a heap of work today, but will write more when I can come up for air. Below I've pasted a post from my old blog describing a…
Let me know what's missing - in the past installments I missed some of the obvious biggies (and you did not tell me!) like MyDD, Juan Cole, Crooks & Liars...!!!! Obscure and Confused Ideas Obsidian Wings Ocellated Oekologie Olduvai George Omics! Omics! Omnidictum: Essays in Science Omni Brain (…

Huh? Al Franken has announced he's running for Senate, and you're posting about genes and flippers? You haven't had your coffee yet, have you?

PZ: WRITE SOMETHING, would you? Links to what other people have done are neither big nor clever.

He is writing something, Ben. He's writing his book. So chill.

By Scott Simmons (not verified) on 01 Feb 2007 #permalink

I am not a fan of the arguments given in that link. It is not that I do not agree with the general reasoning, but rather that I think it avoid actual creationist arguments and point-of-views. Doing so is a bit of a strawman, and is not up to good standards as far as I can see...

It is true the fossil record does suggest a common origin, most likely from Acanthodians, of both the limbs of chondrichthyans and Osteichthyans (if you care to use that name), but a loss of a developmental mechanism in one group relative to another, if it had occured, should not been seen as any type of doom to evolutionary theory.

In short, shit happens..