Let's deface more walls this way

You'll need to scroll from side to side to appreciate this scientifically inaccurate but very cool act of vandalism.

Tags

More like this

A weekend in the Peaks for family purposes, and to our great surprise just around the corner was a rather nice cliff. It is very tucked away and rather takes you by surprise. Here's the google maps link. If you scroll out a bit you'll see "Wheeldon Trees Farm holiday cottages" where we stayed, and…
No, I don't mean the werewolf entry in Wikipedia, I mean the use of Wikipedia by werewolves. You see, I recently received a review copy of The Werewolf's Guide to Life: A Manual for the Newly Bitten by Ritch Duncan, Bob Powers and Emily Flake. As you can imagine, it an imaginary non-fiction book…
First off, the e-mails have been sent, and if you're a member of ResearchBlogging.Org, then you should haev a vote to cast in the ResearchBlogging Awards! So go vote for Observations of a Nerd for the best lay-level and biology blog as well as best research post of the year *cough* *cough* your…
Have you wondered about the buzz in the air this week? Why the world seems to tingle with the excitement of little wings and millions of jointed legs? No? Well, you're probably on the wrong drugs. Anyway. This week is National Pollinator Week here in the U.S., where we take time to appreciate…

That is very cool, very well done. I like the idea of it, I guess it's supposed be about the idea rather than accuracy.

Evolution and social comment, who would have thunk.

I love the social commentary! It's cool enough to forgive the scientific inaccuracy. :)

By Pygmy Loris (not verified) on 27 Apr 2007 #permalink

it IS cool, although even I was disturbed by the transition between dinos and elephants. I doubt it was a mere act of vandalism, though. AND I agree, there is enough social commentary to make me believe the piece was contracted.

Cool art, but don't try and find out about the site by truncating the address to yonkis.com. Definitely not work safe!

That is sooooo cool.

This is how the famous graffiti artist Banksy answers the art/vandalism question.

http://www.banksy.co.uk/help/index.html

Is graffiti art or vandalism?

That word has a lot of negative connotations and it alienates people, so no, I don't like to use the word 'art' at all.

By Christian Burnham (not verified) on 27 Apr 2007 #permalink

I am forever amazed at all of the skills exhibited by graffiti artists. In the babble of the job market they "conceptualize new projects", "marshal limiteed amounts of manpower and materials in a time sensitive manner", "comunicate difficult concepts in a manner which can be understood by a wide range of clients". Any high flying organization should be happy to hire them.

In Elgin, IL there is a water treatment facility with an unfinished mural of life from the Cambrian to (I think) the Carboniferous. Very cool, more scientifically accurate than this, though without the social commentary. We definitely need more stuff like this.

[...back to lurking now...]

Do you know for a fact that it is "vandalism"?

By notthedroids (not verified) on 27 Apr 2007 #permalink

I can already hear the Creationists saying "see, this proves that the message of evolution is for man to kill one another."

Very cute artwork. You might add a warning about the X-rated ad banner that can show up on the site. It is in spanish, but I think I got to see a very graphic ad for an interesting combination of flashlight and masturbation aid. The wife would not have been amused to see that on my computer.

By Mike Mason (not verified) on 27 Apr 2007 #permalink

"but I think I got to see a very graphic ad for an interesting combination of flashlight and masturbation aid. "

Man, I can't believe there are still people on the net who haven't been exposed to the "Fleshlight."

I must have hung out on fuckedcompany.com too long.

I think PZ likes because a squid (or squid like creature) was featured as one of our descendants

In Elgin, IL there is a water treatment facility with an unfinished mural of life from the Cambrian to (I think) the Carboniferous.

Well I hope I'm not represented in that mural. I was born in Elgin in what almost feels to be the Cambrian.
.

By Ick of the East (not verified) on 27 Apr 2007 #permalink

The only graffiti where I live is swear words and crudely drawn stick figures with ridiculously large genitals.

By The quantum pancake (not verified) on 27 Apr 2007 #permalink

Re #'s 2 and 4,
You guys really need to get out of your labs a bit more often, who knows maybe even spend some time visiting a few art museums and galleries ;)
Naive art requires no forgiveness from anybody.

By Fernando Magyar (not verified) on 27 Apr 2007 #permalink

That's one wide picture. And an interesting piece of art. Here they have commissioned some art for buildings by local artists so graffiti won't get on them ... maybe this was similar.

@#7: Isn't Banksy the one that made art by cleaning selective parts of a wall? There was a UK artist that went in tunnels and on squares with a brush and a bucket of soap and "drew" paintings by removing grime. The actually wanted to bust him for vandalism...

A weed is a plant in the wrong plce, vandalism is art in the wrong place.

By Thr secret gov… (not verified) on 27 Apr 2007 #permalink

A little OT comment on the paranoia in the U.S. today. Punished, not for tagging walls, but for doing his homework assignment.

"A high school senior was arrested after writing that "it would be funny" to dream about opening fire in a building and having sex with the dead victims, authorities said.

Another passage in the essay advised his teacher at Cary-Grove High School: "don't be surprised on inspiring the first CG shooting," according to a criminal complaint filed this week.

Allen Lee, 18, faces two disorderly conduct charges over the creative-writing assignment, which he was given on Monday in English class at the northern Illinois school."

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/04/27/student.essay.arrest.ap/index.html

"A conviction could bring up to 30 days in jail and a maximum $1,500 fine." Going to school, doing the work, and being a straight-A student can be expensive.

It's interesting that people are debating whether it's vandalism or not, and apparently assume that if you have permission, it's not vandalism, but if you don't, it is.

I like to consider whether anything was damaged, and the intent of the work. Here, nothing was damaged (unless you are a fan of grimy, grey featureless cement walls) and the intent was clearly artistic.

I think the tags near the mural were neither art nor vandalism; they didn't destroy or cover up anything, but they didn't have a lot of originality. Just local kids marking their territory.

That's cool. In instances like that, I think that it's okay to sacrifice accuracy in favor of art. The symbolism is obvious and it looks so cool.

Funny how, in the old-fashioned popular pictures of "the parade of evolution", as well as in this one, as soon as man-like creatures appear, they are shown becoming more human, yes, but also using always better weapons: from the club to the spear, to the sword, to the bow, to the crossbow, to the rifle...

By Christophe Thill (not verified) on 28 Apr 2007 #permalink

Wow. Not vandalism. Vandalism detracts from something's value. This mural is made of Win and Awesome. If I had a shred of talent this would adorn a bridge in my town.

By Godless McHeat… (not verified) on 28 Apr 2007 #permalink

Is it really real? Looks like the trees and other "art" repeat....
Where is it supposed to be?

By lobsterlily (not verified) on 28 Apr 2007 #permalink

It looks like a Photoshop or similar.

There are areas where the image above the mural overlaps or repeats, while the mural itself does not.

(I suppose the effect could be caused by the photographer stitching the series of photos together and putting more effort into getting the mural right, and letting the other bits stay raw.)

Re: #19:

"Naive art requires no forgiveness from anybody."

Yeah, well, naive is naive. In art museums and galleries or anywhere else.

Not many here, if any, are unimpressed with the effort, or in its demonstration of an inkling of the concept on the part of the artist.

Re: #31:

There is no "auto" in the stitching together of what is obviously a very wide-angle scene. Its simply a mosaic of lots of photos to produce a single panoramic one (easily accomplished in a program such as "photoshop"). Also, it is manifestly NOT "mirror-reversed". The right half, if appreciated in sequence from right to left, is actually a significantly, though marginally, more accurate depiction of an evolutionary sequence than the left half appreciated from left-to-right. This suggests that more than one artist was involved in its conception (Like, "You take the right side, I'll do the left side".

By Arnosium Upinarum (not verified) on 29 Apr 2007 #permalink

@#32:

There is no "auto" in the stitching together of what is obviously a very wide-angle scene. Its simply a mosaic of lots of photos to produce a single panoramic one (easily accomplished in a program such as "photoshop").

It might have been done manually in Photoshop, or some other software. Or it might have been done with this: http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~mbrown/autostitch/autostitch.html , or some other automated edge-matching image-stitching software. Do you know for sure?

@#32:

Also, it is manifestly NOT "mirror-reversed".

The image manifestly IS mirror-reversed. Look at the text on the back of the bus shelter. Note that the capital "P" and "R" are facing to the left. Also, the first Flickr image I linked to shows the bus shelter as well, on the right side of the mural, rather than on the left as in the wide panorama.

By Owlmirror (not verified) on 29 Apr 2007 #permalink