Here's a strategy to make money from your expertise!
There is some bad news, though.
- It's been done many times already, so there is "competition". There doesn't seem to be a lot of competition, though, and the market for this kind of "science" seems insatiable.
- Wrong answers and bad answers seem to be much more valuable than truth and accuracy.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Actually, Journalists do take some of the blame for the death of newspapers:
But why is the business model dying?
Competition is a factor, and blogs are obviously part of that mix. But again, if I'd started a business and someone else opened up down the street and offered a more appealing product,…
Some guy named Mulshine, who is apparently an ancient journalist (remember: generation is mindset, not age), penned one of those idiotic pieces for Wall Street Journal, willingly exposing his out-datedness and blindness to the world - read it yourself and chuckle: All I Wanted for Christmas Was a…
We had a fun evening on Friday—a crowd of a few hundred people sat down to consider the problem of a morality at the University of Chicago. At the front of the room we had Bob Bossie (a very liberal Catholic), Sunsara Taylor (a very articulate Communist) and me to make a few opening remarks and…
Over at Backreaction, Bee takes up the eternal question of scientists vs. journalists in exactly the manner you would expect from a physicist: she makes a graph. Several of them, in fact.
It's generally a good analysis of the situation, namely that scientists and journalists disagree about how to…
My tale:
1) Develop mathematical models for electrostatic interactions between water molecules.
2) ....?
3) Profit.
Now if, in the last panel, Danae had been saying, "Test me," instead of "Trust me," she'd be more likely to have a product to sell instead of just a fra-- never mind.
If people are wary of science, this could be one reason why. I even catch myself thinking, well, who paid for that study? It shouldn't matter if the science is solid, but there's a lot of bias out there.
This is (unfortunately) the M.O. of too many ego-driven small biotech companies...especially the last line about wrong/bad answers being much more valuable than truth and accuracy.
This hired guns of science for hire schtick would be much funnier if it wasn't true. Reminds me of Behe who is defending a biology textbook from Bob Jones U. in the California textbook case. For 20,000 bucks. Details at M. Dunford's The Questionable Authority and PT.
The biology textbook for kids looks like it was written by satan. It is not just wrong it is actively evil.
This is one time when believers have an advantage over atheists. ID doesn't exist but Diabolical Design certainly does.
You mean, it's not true that market forces will always select the best option? Damn!
It seems Behe is the new Eric von Daniken, exchanging an invisible man with a white beard for space aliens. Space aliens is how I've always dealt with I.D., as in "Prove it wasn't space aliens who started it all." I get less flack that way.
But the cartoon reminds me of one particular strange fellow who thought he could create an infinite compression hard drive if only he could come up with the right algorithm. I asked him if he had heard of one-way (mathematical) mapping, and went on my merry way.
Two days later, he approached me again and started screaming at me. I learned an important lesson there. Kooks are to be avoided, not encouraged.
> Kooks are to be avoided, not encouraged.
Indeed, a personal rule of mine: Don't poke the nutters.
People wouldn't have to muddy the waters if the truth weren't so darned inconvenient and...true.
You mean, it's not true that market forces will always select the best option? Damn!
BLASPHEMER!
Zeno: Hard to find a universal "best" I'm afraid.
Look at the computer industry. So many shills making so many reports, all by some mysteriuos chance in favor of whoever pays their bills. If only their work could be used as a power source instead...
Good gracious. Brownian is dogging my heels in the various threads. Either he's stalking me or ... he's just using me as an excuse to post more comments and remain in contention for the big 500,000 sweepstakes.
Or vice versa.
Gee PZ, I was going to buy the next generation of Ion cleansing and Toxin removal foot spa systems for 699$, guess it will make me feel good.
And the water changes colour as a proof of all the toxins that have gone out of my body, wonderful machine.
People tend to believe anyhing, provided :
- it makes you feel good to believe in it (the more expensive the device or service, the higher the probability that this point will be satisfied)
- it is grounded on some sort of common sense rationale
- there is some form of substaniation, usually refered to as "scientific", the validiy of which is is most case not important
-most potential target customer cannot verify the validity of the claims and will generally regard the recommendation of wise older gentlemen or ladies, politicians, movie stars, sportsmen, and kings as important
By no means am I claiming IT analysts are doing science though.
If you plot the average number of comments acceped in the count over he last 30 min you will see it is at between 3 and 5/min. We are now missing 12 comments so that we should hi 500,000 within less than 2 minutes, now if there is a as minute surge, i EXPECT i SHOULD HIT. NOW
If you plot the average number of comments acceped in the count over he last 30 min you will see it is at between 3 and 5/min. We are now missing 6 comments so that we should hi 500,000 within less than 1 minutes, now if there is a as minute surge, i EXPECT i SHOULD HIT. NOW...
Does Negentropyeater really expect us to believe that #15 and #16 were an accidental double post?
It's a reprise of the old shady lawyer/accountant joke whose punchline is: "What do you *want* the answer to be?"