What not to do in an emergency

I'm sure you all remember that plane crash in the Hudson a while back, in which all the passengers survived thanks to the commendable competence of the pilot, Chesley Sullenberger, and the crew. What impressed the atheist community, too, was that this was not a case where the crew credited some fickle deity for keeping them alive — it was good old skill, training, and keeping a cool head in times of danger.

What if, instead, the pilot had trusted in a god? We've got an example of that, too.

A plane made a similar emergency water landing off the coast of Sicily in 2005. In this case, the Tunisian pilot panicked, and instead of taking emergency measures or even trying to reach a nearby airport, he instead chose to pray loudly. I'm sure that was reassuring to the passengers.

Sixteen people died.

Reason gets some revenge, though. The pilot has been sentenced to 10 years in jail for his neglect of his responsibilities. I like that; resorting to prayer represents an abdication of responsibility.

Tags

More like this

Rabbi Avi Shafran is a columnist who, to my mind, represents the very worst of religious dogma. He often writes about "morality", bemoaning the horrid state of godlessness, but his morality is little more than the rote obedience of the dogmatically orthodox. His usual complaint is that atheism…
Kevin Drum has a short post noting that Trump has taught other Republican politicians how to lie more brazenly. Politicians have never been noted for their honesty, but we are seeing something new this time around. It is very aggravating that Trump simply makes it up as he goes along, while…
I'm stuck in the US East Coast ice and snow trying to get home after some science work for our nation's health agency (that is my rationale for posting this on my Sb blog). My four-hour equipment and weather delay has now turned into a canceled flight. The gate agent just announced that those of us…
Chesley Sullenberger is the pilot who successfully crash-landed his plane in the Hudson River after both engines were lost to goose strikes. His book, Highest Duty: My Search for What Really Matters, is out today. A while ago he was asked at which point he started praying as the plain went down…

That's precisely what it is. If only we applied such a standard to jobs where millions, not tens, if lives hinged on a person's actions.

At least we can give thanks to god that no more than 16 people died.

:/ that should be "...of lives..." I blame my scheming keyboard and its wicked scheming. Or maybe my own inattentiveness.

I'm so glad that he got punished for this. Unbelievable stupidity. Next time I fly I'd prefer to know what the pilots stance on religion is.

It's obvious those sixteen people died because they didn't pray, or pray fervently enough. The pilot prayed and he's alive, right? Therefore, prayer works.

I could feel my brain cells convulsing even as I typed that...

By Tabby Lavalamp (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

So religious fundamentalists and aircraft controls don't make for a happy ending. Who would have thought it!

If 10 years is fair for killing 16, what should one get for invading a country and killing 5000?

He was convicted in an Italian court? He must not have been using a catholic prayer.

7#

If 10 years is fair for killing 16, what should one get for invading a country and killing 5000?

A pilot is trained to understand the systems he controls...or realise when there is a system out of control...and the recommended protocol from the manual to rectify or minimize that defect.
Praying to god admits that he was not professional enough to rationalise a situation.
It was an abdication of his duty to those passengers that died.

A politician by default has no such responsibility and even less rationalisation...they boogie by public opinion at the time!

A slight but important difference.

By Strangebrew (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

resorting to prayer represents an abdication of responsibility.

Well, resorting only to prayer does. He's not a priest, he's paid for doing something else than praying.

Of course that something is devotion to materialism and to naturalism, the belief that it is only matter that has any kind of importance to flying and to saving souls in their earthly bodies. Frankly, I'm appalled at such bigotry, but it's rife throughout the world.

The only fair thing to do is to teach both materialistic flying, and prayer flying. Only then can we be certain that the atheists don't dominate flying as they now dominate biology and the causes to which it limits our investigations.

Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/6mb592

If 10 years is fair for killing 16, what should one get for invading a country and killing 5000?

The Presidential Medal of Freedom?

(Oh, and much more than 5,000 were killed in the invasion of Iraq. See here.)

By Feynmaniac (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

However much we might wish that it doesn't really make a difference what others believe, it's still important. Atheists have an obligation to speak out on behalf of society. Perhaps no atheists spoke strongly enough to this pilot.

By CrypticLife (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

Well that clears that up. Instead of groping and harrassing passengers before they get on a plane, the authorities would be better off scrutinising the religious tendencies of pilots and cabin crews.

I once worked with a man that claimed that, in the event of an emergency, he wouldn't move a muscle unless God told him too. I regretted that God could have just given him brains, then he wouldn't need to tell him what to do every time.

And yet for some reason a politician can listen to that higher power telling them to invade iraq and there is no accountability. To think that the country of mussolini beat us to the punch on this kind of justice.....a shame.

Praying is not the least you can do - it's the least useful thing you can do.

@#4 "Next time I fly I'd prefer to know what the pilots stance on religion is."

As a pilot in training in a university that specializes in aviation (ERAU), and knowing those who have had internships at airlines, I can tell you that American pilots tend to lean towards fundamentalist Christianity and are generally Republican on the political side of things. However, even the most religious pilots are generally professional enough to know that emergencies can't be dealt with using superstition. They'll be throwing praise and glory towards their personal gods in the media afterward, but they sure as well wouldn't do so in the cockpit...

...the good ones at least. You should be more afraid of the standards that pilots are held to in this school and others. There are many people who graduate out of here that just shouldn't be flying planes (or designing them, but that's a whole different story).

... a Tunisian pilot, huh?

All that shows is that he was probably praying to the wrong god.

It's a blessed miracle the plane wasn't smote by lightning on the way down!

By Pierce R. Butler (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

Google news currently lists 6 stories on this verdict. Only the Reuters story mentions the praying-instead-of-flying aspect; the others focus on an improper fuel gauge, and the resultant ordering of too little fuel for the return trip.

Was the prayer, as mentioned in Reuters, a part of the prosecution? If so, the other stories are seriously lacking. Kudos to Phil Stewart, though.

Flying along on a wing and a prayer
Works better for songs than for planes;
Trusting in God, when the fuel isn’t there,
Is a poor way of using your brains!

How dare you criticise this pilot! Can't you see it's all part of the sky fairy's plan that you mere mortals could never know!

Sheesh, so naive.

"Reason gets some revenge"

I don't think so. Punishing someone for praying is just one of the many evils of modern society.

"...resorting to prayer represents an abdication of responsibility."

Precisely!
Absolutely!
Every time!
And if the "prayor" doesn't get the requested response, s/he can always revel in the resulting pain and anguish as a sign of god's love.
It's ironic that xians can abdicate responsibility for everything and yet sit in judgment on those who do take responsibility. I find it all highly amusing at times.

Its interesting to me the fact that the pilot of the Hudson plane crash was a seasoned, very experienced, years of training older person instead of some over-optimistic, depend on the auto-pilot, over-religious young punk.

Nothing against hiring the young people but something about years of practical experience and hands-on work adds more creditability.

(yes, I'm showing my age)

BTW PZ: love the web site, it’s my morning online paper in the morning.

We train hard and often for most emergencies. What is sad is that it was only a fuel gauge inop malfunction. Given that he should have been doing his paperwork and carrying reserves - 16 deaths could have been easily avoided. However what is surprising is that the airline checks did not pull this nutter off the line.

By Nikhil Rajwade (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

Quoth Vic (#14): "I once worked with a man that claimed that, in the event of an emergency, he wouldn't move a muscle unless God told him too." (sic)

If that was my friend, I'd punch him in the diaphragm. In response to the resulting angry and confused look on his face, I'd explain that it wasn't my fault because god failed to make him dodge ;)

@#26 And the paradox of hiring pilots is unearthed. Everyone wants experienced pilots but nobody wants to hire young.

Unfortunately, as with sports, the younger you start, the better you will be in the end. Many of our most famous aviators started flying in their mid teens. If you keep hiring experienced pilots, a lot of young potential gets thrown away to other careers, and soon there will be no experienced pilots left.

Of course, that may all be left to robots, but I will not give up the good fight.

DEATH TO SOFTWARE ENGINEERS!!!

#4:

I'm so glad that he got punished for this. Unbelievable stupidity. Next time I fly I'd prefer to know what the pilots stance on religion is.

Yes! Let the market decide! Airline A advertises that its pilots are all atheists who have extensive training in emergency landing techniques. Airline B advertises that all its pilots are devout Christians who will rely solely on prayer in the event of an emergency. Which airline do you think Christian flyers would choose?

...he instead chose to pray loudly. I'm sure that was reassuring to the passengers...

Ah yes, truly inspires confidence. Sounds like a 'Say... there wouldn't happen to be any chutes handy, would there?' moment if ever there were one.

Someone on another forum I read made what I see as the fair point that this probably wasn't so much excessive religiosity as blind panic. He may as well have been calling out to mommy.

I am not saying this removes his responsibility for crashing the plane, however (as he shouldn't have panicked).

@#26: And how would you propose these young pilots get these "years of practical experience and hands-on work" if people like you won't hire them, hmm?

By Sgt. Obvious (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

It's less an issue of prayer so much as an issue of cold-bloodedness.

Nothing scares me more than being a passenger in a vehicle (whether airborne or on wheels) with a driver/pilot who freezes in the face of fear. It has happened to me on a few occasions, one of them with my own mother at the wheel, and all I wished was that I was the one driving instead of her.

The type of people who are not cold-blooded, those who tend to freeze like rabbits on a high-traffic highway, should be barred of piloting, or of any other job in which they can face responsibility for others in high-danger situations.

So... you don't want God as your copilot. Clears that up.

One of the guys at work got his pilots license several years ago. He kept pointing out that the first rule in an emergency was to "keep flying the plane" while you figured out options. Praying =/= flying.

By Nerd of Redhead, OM (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

Perhaps he'd been listening to Carrie Underwood's Jesus, Take The Wheel beforehand. The gist of the song is, "When I screw up, I abdicate all responsibility and turn everything over to an invisible, immaterial religious figure."

Must be some way to apply the idea that prayer = abdicating responsibility to the Texas BOE and the Oklahoma Leg...

Posted by: AVSN | March 24, 2009

"Reason gets some revenge"

I don't think so. Punishing someone for praying is just one of the many evils of modern society.

First prize awarded for missing the point. The pilot was not punished for praying. The pilot was punished for praying when there was a better course of action. Big difference.

If you were in the middle of a crisis situation, which would you pray for; a person in charge who acted who a person who took the precious seconds to pray.

Oh, you poor persecuted christian, tormented by secular modern society.

By Janine, Insult… (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

The pilot will be free until the appeals process is complete. What is to stop him from praying again?

BS

By Blind Squirrel FCD (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

#33:

And how would you propose these young pilots get these "years of practical experience and hands-on work" if people like you won't hire them, hmm?

I can guess. Flying around dropping bombs on foreigners? Isn't Mr Sullenberger a former USAF pilot?

While there is some justice in this result, I think it more likely reflects the tendency of non-US courts to criminalize accidents, which I think is unfortunate. Note that the pilot wasn't the only one to get jail time.

By Greg Esres (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

No, no, no, this is just gods way of letting the survivors know how much he loves them.

By CosmicTeapot (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

Isn't there an old joke about a very religious guy whose boat is wrecked at sea and he's alone, clinging to a piece of flotsam, praying fervently. Along comes a guy in a speedboat who tells him to climb on board, but he says "no, I'm waiting for my god to save me" and returns to his prayers. The speedboat guy goes away. Along comes a large ship which hails to him, but he says "no, I don't need help, my god will help me", and he continues to pray. The coastguard send out a helicopter and the winchman comes down, but the guy refuses to be winched up: "no thanks, my god will come and rescue me". The following night, his bit of flotsam breaks up and he drowns and ascends to heaven, and passes through the pearly gates. When he meets his god asks "god, I prayed so much, why did you not rescue me?". And god looks puzzled and says "what about the speedboat, ship and helicopter that I sent for you?".

Yup, prayer works - if people do all god's work for him!!

Someone on another forum I read made what I see as the fair point that this probably wasn't so much excessive religiosity as blind panic. He may as well have been calling out to mommy.

Could be, but I suspect having the concept of prayer in ones head at all, and considered a good thing, increases one's tendency to throw up one's hands and cry for help.

I thought this was how God answered prayers, 1)Yes 2)No 3)Wait. Maybe God just said No, you're SOL.

"When I screw up, I abdicate all responsibility and turn everything over to an invisible, immaterial religious figure."

Evasion, in one of its many guises. Some drink, some take drugs, some freeze (retreating to some inner space), some take religion.

Everything but face the fact that you and you alone can get you out of this mess.

Now you wonder why religion and other magical thinking a la "The Secret" are attractive and addictive ? Everybody once in a while would wish somebody else was there to solve his/her problems, like when mom and dad could (but that was an illusion) when we were small. Some of us simply refuse to grow up.

With sincere and heartfelt apologies to Harold Adamson and Jimmie McHugh...

One of our planes was flying
Over water, just south of Rome
The fuel gauge, sadly, was lying
There was not enough gas to get home
The engines were skipping and stalling
The plane started tossing about
And the passengers found it appalling
When they all heard the pilot shout out:

Comin in on a wing and a prayer
Listen up, god, I know that you’re there
Though we’ve run out of gas
I know god loves my ass
Comin’ in on a wing and a prayer.

What a show, what a flight, boys
We’re gonna hit some whitecaps here tonight
How we pray as we limp through the air
Look below, there’s just waves everywhere
With all our fuel gone
We can still carry on
Comin in on a wing and a prayer

Comin in on a wing and a prayer
Listen up, god, I know that you’re there
Though we’ve run out of gas
I know god loves my ass
Comin’ in on a wing and a [splash].

http://digitalcuttlefish.blogspot.com/2009/03/wing-and-prayer.html

I thought this was how God answered prayers, 1)Yes 2)No 3)Wait. Maybe God just said "No, you're SOL".

he was hoping for a miracle and edned up with a tragicle.

By Naughtius Maximus (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

10 years in jail when he is responsible for killing 16 people is ludicrous.

He was not just incompetent, he was negligent. He should have been sentenced at least to 10 years EACH for the 16 deaths, to be served consecutively.

I don't know what the penal laws are in Italy (or if they even have them) but in the US, this guy might be out in 3 years.

By NewEnglandBob (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

It's a wonder the moron didn't start singing "nearer my god to thee" and steer for Naples, and yell out, "more souls for thee". Oh hell, let's really dramatise this scenario and have him crash the plane into Vesuvius, set off a cataclysmic seismic eruption and wipe out metropolitan Naples. Now there's a rapture on a biblical scale.

#50: Edward Current FTW! :D

Janine @ 39
I didn't miss the point, you did. I am saying that this decision isn't a win for reason. I will ignore your ad hominum attack.

AVSN,
I think the pilot abdicated his training as a pilot in favor of his training as a prayer monkey. This choice was not reasonable according to the judge, prosecutor and jury apparently. Many here agree.

Prayer, if you must rely on it, is a private matter between you an your special friend. If you substitute it for reasoned public behavior, you lose. Always.

Navin #35 "So... you don't want God as your copilot"

Nope. I want a copilot as my copilot - someone who actually knows how to help me fly the damned plane.

Not some imaginary sky fairy, flying spaghetti monster or feathered serpent.

By lordshipmayhem (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

Glad this guy is having to face consequences for his incompetence.

About the young versus experienced pilots there's a fairly simple solution. Every commercial airliner has a pilot and a copilot. Pair up the more experienced pilots with the least experienced for copilots.

@#57: Okay, yeah, that makes sense. Thanks for replying.

By Sgt. Obvious (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

Here's a link to another example of what can be done correctly and without prayer to land a plane with a fuel problem.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Transat_Flight_236

I would guess the Tunisian pilot lacked enough training or, if you'll pardon the phrase, he had a lack of faith in his own abilities.

AVSN #54

I didn't miss the point, you did. I am saying that this decision isn't a win for reason.

It wasn't a win for superstition either.

I will ignore your ad hominum attack.

If you were ignoring it you wouldn't have made this comment.

By 'Tis Himself (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

I want to see Atheist Airlines.

I want to fly with a carrier where I know the pilot and crew are atheists. Where I know they will, in a crisis, do stuff that might actually, you know... make sense and help.... rather than retreat into infantilism.

By Jack Rawlinson (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

If 10 years is fair for killing 16, what should one get for invading a country and killing 5000?

A Presidential Library, most likely.

By Teh Merkin (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

Punishing someone for praying is just one of the many evils of modern society.

No-one has suggested that anyone be punished for praying, anymore than anyone has suggested people be punished for wanking. It's the circumstances in which you choose to indulge in it that make it culpable.

Had the pilot decided he just had time for a quick one off the wrist before, um, splashdown I sure the results would have been the same.

New England Bob writes:
10 years in jail when he is responsible for killing 16 people is ludicrous.

He was not just incompetent, he was negligent. He should have been sentenced at least to 10 years EACH for the 16 deaths, to be served consecutively.

If the idea of a criminal "justice" system is to punish, then you're right. If the idea is to cure/correct social misbehaviors, then I have to question what's the point of putting someone like this in prison at all -- surely he's learned from his mistake to a degree that I shudder to contemplate. Those who howl for punishment are so... old testament.

Years ago in a training situation far away I sat through a session on very effective pilot training and why it was important. For part of the training we listened to the cockpit tapes of a DC-10 that lost a cargo door coming out of Paris, with a resulting crash that killed everyone aboard. When the sound of the cargo door blowing out was heard, one of the pilots immediately started praying. When they figured out what the problem was, both pilots said their last prayers as the plane plunged into the ground.

A few weeks later an American DC-10 was miles above Detroit, Michigan, when the same thing happened. When the cargo door blew, one flight attendant was killed immediately. The cockpit tapes were much different. The pilots heard the noise, asked what it was, and then cursed. They got a report from another flight attendant about the disaster that had just struck them. More curses.

Then, with just a trace of discussion on what to do, they got on the radio to Detroit's airport, explained they were spiraling down to make an emergency landing, and with most of their hydraulics to the back gone and rudder control almost non-existent, and with a few more curses, they landed the thing in Detroit. One life lost.

I don't know whether either pilot held to faith, though I suspect at least one did, just knowing the numbers of faithful among pilots. The difference is whether the crew understands that they have any power over the situation, and whether they use it. There are times when it is a bad idea to make God the default copilot, or worse, autopilot. I don't care what the faith of the pilot is, so long as the pilot will do everything she or he can to keep the plane and passengers safe.

I do worry about non-union airlines, though. I prefer an airline where I know that if a mechanic or a pilot wants to ground an airplane for a safety issue, there is a union that will back up the pilot or mechanic in a contest against the company, before the FAA.

Thing is, PZ kind of underminds it right there in the text. The salient point here is that the pilot panicked, not that he prayed, even if that's the story the media liked.

If the pilot had been an atheist, and instead of praying, he'd just screamed like a little girl, he'd have been just as negligent, he'd have been just as deserving of jail time. But I wouldn't be reading a big block of triumphantalism about those religious fools getting theirs, and how sweet the schadenfreude is and all that.

I don't see anyone arguing that this pilot made a reasoned (but incorrect) decision that prayer was the course of action most likely to produce optimum results. The man panicked, which he oughtn't have done. Unless you mean to argue that atheists are inherently less prone to panic -- that one can be held together in a crisis by the magical powers of one's atheism, and draw strength from it, then it doesn't really say a whole lot.

A man lost his nerve in a moment of extraordinary stress, and people died as a result. To revel in this as a shining example of the evils of religion is both irrational and, um, kind of a jerkass thing to do.

I imagine that there've been plenty of atheists who have panicked in an emergency and acted irrationally. The only difference is that they choose something other than "Oh Jesus!" to shout when it happens.

Ross, you totally miss the point. The pilot is trained, when emergencies happen, to fly the plane. It is his job to bring it in somehow, and in a way to minimize fatalities, both of the passengers and on the ground. By not flying the plane when he was praying, the pilot increased likelyhood of fatalities. Compare this to the Hudson River landing. The praying pilot didn't do his job. He deserves punishment, and mocking for not doing his job to pray.

By Nerd of Redhead, OM (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

Ross,

Fair point apart from the dig at little girls, who have often been known to stay calm in a crisis.

It could be argued that atheists know that in that situation prayer is not an option, so the choice is between scream in panic and die or fly the bloody plane. Option c - put it in the big feller's hands - is not available.

A man lost his nerve in a moment of extraordinary stress, and people died as a result. To revel in this as a shining example of the evils of religion is both irrational and, um, kind of a jerkass thing to do.

You people who keep pointing out the bleeding obvious, that the prayer was probably the equivalent of "Oh my God," are missing the real point, which is that prayer happens not to work.

You miss it because it's so obvious that not only secularists but even most religionists much prefer to rely on anything but prayer if they can. And yet the supposed "efficaciousness" of prayer continues to be espoused by any number of leaders.

While PZ didn't break any ground by noting that prayer doesn't do a damn thing, the same message was repeated for the simple fact that it doesn't take in many minds.

Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/6mb592

So... you don't want God as your copilot.

Uh, no. Anybody here wants God as their anastesist at their next surgery ?

So... you don't want God as your copilot.

not only do I not want an imaginary sky pixie as a copilot, I don't want a pilot who wants an imaginary sky pixie as a copilot.

I can tell you that American pilots tend to lean towards fundamentalist Christianity and are generally Republican on the political side of things.

Is that because a large fraction of them are products of the U.S. Air Force, and specficially of the U.S. Air Force Academy, which is a notorious hotbed of (unconstitutional) conservative Christian indoctrination?

That last bit has always struck me as strange, BTW. I know Colorado is a "red state," of course, but the campus architecture at the Air Force Academy is aggressively modern, and the campus is surrounded by a natural environment that smacks you in the face with geology... so it's hard to understand this as a place that harbors so much 15th century supernaturalism.

I don't think so. Punishing someone for praying is just one of the many evils of modern society.

Posted by: AVSN | March 24, 2009

Janine @ 39
I didn't miss the point, you did. I am saying that this decision isn't a win for reason. I will ignore your ad hominum attack.

You said that the pilot was punished for praying. You are wrong. Do not bullshit me you poor persecute wannabe christian martyr.

Guess what? I did not give a flying fuck if you pray or not. No not force me to do the same. And do not neglect your duties because you had to pray.

By Janine, Insult… (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

If the pilot had been an atheist, and instead of praying, he'd just screamed like a little girl, he'd have been just as negligent, he'd have been just as deserving of jail time.

Yet, as far as I know, nobody has ever funded a serious study investigating the effectiveness of shitting one's pants.

By Guy Incognito (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

So... you don't want God as your copilot.

Jesus rides besides me
He never buys any smokes

By Janine, Insult… (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

I'd think it's possib;e to fly a plane and scream in panic.
But then, my evidence comes from the movie "Airplane".

By teammarty (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

16 people died, AVSN. Your useful prayers for them are...? Fuck off.
Srsly.

By Thunderbird5 (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

#67:

If the pilot had been an atheist, and instead of praying, he'd just screamed like a little girl, he'd have been just as negligent, he'd have been just as deserving of jail time.

Sheesh, is this so hard to understand? Atheists are not trained from childhood to believe that "screaming like a little girl" will help in such a situation. I've never read a book which advocates screaming for problem solving; I've never watched an interview where the survivor of some disaster explains how his chosen solution was to yell and wet himself, while the interviewer nods approvingly; I've never seen a movie where the hero gravely tells his compatriots "all we can do now start wailing and sobbing uncontrollaby".

Well Moggie, I think one of the Airplane movies might have come close to stepping on your last line. But since nobody is using spoof movies as life guides, your point stands. ;)

By Grendels Dad (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

I think that most of pilots should be able to react on an emergency situation they just have thousands of lifes on their hands
Fred Smilek is the acting president of the Society to Save Endangered Species. It was founded two years ago by Fred Smilek along with his two best friends Charles and Jonathan. [www.fredjsmilek.com]

By Fred smilek (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

Fred smilek - WTF? You get lost on the way to the asylum Fred? Grammar, spelling, on topic. Three rules that make posting so much more fun...

Are you sure the pilot's name wasn't Rayford Steele? ;)

Thus, those who are against humanism, or acknowledging human achievement, ought not get any job that requires human achievement like piloting an airplane.

"If 10 years is fair for killing 16, what should one get for invading a country and killing 5000?"

Punishment, unfortunately, does not work based on justice, but rather based on the letter of the law, which we try to make correspond to justice as closely as humanly possible. Of course, it's that, and the fact that perhaps we do not value the lives of people in southwest Asia as much as ourselves.

PZ: PRECISELY

By astrounit (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

avsn the pscho troll:

"Reason gets some revenge"

I don't think so. Punishing someone for praying is just one of the many evils of modern society.

He was punished for killing 16 people, not for praying. Fundies such as AVSN don't think killing is such a bad thing but the rest of society does. That is why we have police, courts, and prisons.

At least we can give thanks to god that no more than 16 people died.

There where only 39 on the plane to begin with. So that's more than 1/3 of the passengers on the plane.

People who survive a planecrash always say it was because they prayed, but most likely, so did those who didn't survive - Victor Borge.

Punishing someone for praying is just one of the many evils of modern society.

He isn't being punished for praying. He is being punished for praying, when he should have been flying an airplane. 10 years seems like a lenient sentance for 16 counts of involuntary manslaughter.

I think it more likely reflects the tendency of non-US courts to criminalize accidents, which I think is unfortunate.

It wasn't an accident. If a plane falls out of the sky, because it's run out of fuel, that's an accident. When a plane falls out of the sky, because the pilot was praying, as opposed to flying the plane, that is involuntary manslaughter. If you lose control of your car, and plow through a mall, hitting random bystanders, because instead of stopping or otherwise regaining control of your car, you're busy praying, you would face similar justice in the USA.

If 10 years is fair for killing 16, what should one get for invading a country and killing 5000?

Kill a man, you're a murderer, kill many, you're a conqurer, kill them all, you're a god.

By FlameDuck (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

For the record, Captain Sullenberger of US Airways Flight 1549 fame is apparently a Methodist, yet somehow he managed to land a stricken plane in the Hudson and save 155 people.

Atheists are not trained from childhood to believe that "screaming like a little girl" will help in such a situation. Sheesh, hardly any religions actually advocate prayer as a substitute for constructive action. In Christianity, for example, the Parable of the Talents is one of Jesus' most important teachings.

There are some exceptions in certain circumstances with fringe religions like Christian Scientists and Jehovah's Witnesses, but in most cases it's considered fairly blasphemous to ask God to bail you out of a situation when you've got the strength and the ability to solve it yourself. Even something as crass as the Prosperity Gospel doesn't teach that if you pray enough, you can sit on your butt and let the money roll in, you still have to work for it - a bunch of broke unemployed parishioners aren't going to pay for all those fancy suits the preachers wear.

Besides, we've no idea how fervent of a believer this poor Tunisian bastard was. The guy panicked and shouted out the first thing that came to mind, like other people have said, he could just as well have been crying for his mommy.

One day A man was caught on his roof during a huge flood. As he clung to his roof he prayed to God to save him.

As he prayed, and the waters raged, a man came up in a boat and said, "Get aboard and I'll get you to safety."

The man refused the assistance, saying, "I'm not worried, God will save me."

So the would be rescuer said, as he pulled out a gun and squeezed off a few rounds, "Well, if you're that determined to die."

Well, yes. Talking to the Old Man in the Sky when you're supposed to be maneuvering a large and immensely dangerous piece of machinery in a way that averts a disaster IS an abdication of responsibility. It doesn't take a genius of legal scholarship to see that.

By Alyson Miers (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

Transcript of ditching from http://jamiehassen.multiply.com/journal/item/205

Hours 15,34' 33"
- commander: check whether it started. Leave it, leave it.. in the name of God, most compassionate, most merciful. What's the ditching procedure?
- second pilot: [incomprehensible] (with Palermo air traffic control)
- commander: confirm the distance, please.
- Palermo control: [incomprehensible]
- commander: confirm the distance, please.
- Palermo: the distance is now 20 miles.
- commander: I think… we are not able, we are not able to reach the terrain. We are at four thousand feet and we are not able, we loose both engines. Can you send for us helicopters or something like that?
- second pilot: ditching.. ditching (talking to self while going through the procedures manual)
- commander: fast, fast.
- Palermo: I can advise.
- second pilot: preparation. . Cabin crew: notify. Sign: on. DPWVS: off. Set it to off there. Cabin and cockpit door: prepare.(reads out loud the ditching procedure)

3'33" to the splash down
- commander: it's better we turn towards that ship, it's better if we turn towards that ship.
- second pilot: should I put [incomprehensible], no?
- commander: no, no, the wind is strong, the wind is strong. Oh! God be clement. In name of God the merciful one, the clement one, in name of God, the merciful one, the clement one...
- second pilot: cabin and cockpit: prepare.
- commander: so this one still doesn't start?
- second pilot: no, it refuses to start.
- Palermo: 1153, Palermo, be informed that we informed ... the ships... Your position is about 22 miles now radial 20… 036,… radial 036, 22 miles.
- commander: uhhh, the battery! Unable, unable to reach, 2200 feet. There are two boats, we are going to join them, left side, heading 180, can you call them please?
- commander: try again, try again (trying to restart the engines)
- Palermo: heading 180, confirmed?
- commander: which one have you ignited, which you have ignited? (stressed tone)
- second pilot: the right one.
- commander: go, go. The other one, the other one!
- second pilot: already did, it refuses to start!
- Palermo: Tuninter 1153, Palermo, say again!
- commander: there is a boat, there is a boat… left side… I'm going to put there. 1100 feet. In the name of God the merciful one, the clement one.
- second pilot: auto, press, dump.
- commander: prepare for emergency ditching.

Less than 1' 55" to the ditching
- Palermo: you are at about… now the position is approximately… 20 miles to east of the field
- commander: Unable to reach, unable to reach
- second pilot: not in a position to reach land. Tuninter 1153 unable to reach the field, we see two ships on the left side, big boats. We try to land… to ditch near of them. If you can call them, please…
- Palermo: [incomprehensible]….we call the military.
- second pilot: before ditching. Optimal ditch altitude. Minimise impact slope. Brace for impact (reads out the ditching procedure)
- commander: good
- second pilot: [incomprehensible] (reads on, seems nervous)
- commander: did it start? try the other one

Less than 27" to the ditching
- commander: is that the sound of the engine?
- second pilot: the same, the same, it does not want to make anything
- commander: God be clement, God be clement
- second pilot: gear level… up… ditch push button before.
- commander: go, it's over now, help me Ali. Be alert Ali. Chokri, get ready, Chokri get ready.
- Chokri: I am ready
- commander: we're touching the sea.
- commander: in the name of God the merciful one, the clement one, in the name of God the merciful one, the clement one

Splash-down hours 15,38' 53"

One day A man was caught on his roof during a huge flood. As he clung to his roof he prayed to God to save him.

As he prayed, and the waters raged, a man came up in a boat and said, "Get aboard and I'll get you to safety."

The man refused the assistance, saying, "I'm not worried, God will save me."

So the would be rescuer said, as he pulled out a gun and squeezed off a few rounds, "Well, if you're that determined to die."

Jokes are funnier when they don't make the person telling them sound like a psychopath.

@87 @95 I think the pilot has been hard done by. To me, he sounded pretty calm and to be working though the check-list in an orderly fashion. There may have been the odd plea to a deity interspersed but I'm not confident that I, in the same, position would have been more impressive (subsituting pleas for explosive bowel emptying effects.) I suspect that being X when most of the victims were Y may have gone against him in a court in Y, for any value of X and Y, and I hope he is released soon. And I would be happy to be a passenger in any plane he flies subsequently.

I don't even get why the religious bother praying even in the most desperate of times. Doesn't their alleged god already know everything, including their desires and needs? Wouldn't prayer be just an annoyance to god? Billions of people constantly reminding him of what he already damn well knows? It would be like being stuck in a football stadium filled with imbeciles constantly reciting their ABC's.

According to the much more detailed write-up at The Grauniad Tunisian pilot who prayed as his plane went down jailed in Italy it was not a fuel gauge malfunction, but a wrong fuel gauge had been installed: A bad bit of design that that's possible, and a poor standard of maintenance that it happened and was not detected. When the fuel ran out, the argument was the pilot could have glided to a nearby airport; instead, he (and maybe also the co-pilot?) panicked and started praying: Absolutely no professionalism there, complete incompetent(s?).

Maybe he was just going with the old adage:

"When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout."

By Blind Pig (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

@NoFear

The fight-or-flight response, I presume. In this case, prayer was the only convenient "flight" (no pun intended) response for the pilot.

By Twin-Skies (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

At first I was horribly angry that the pilot survived at all. But now I see it's better that way: Instead of merciful oblivion (or a big bloke wielding an oversized dessert fork, if you subscribe to the theory that people get the afterlife they know they deserve) he now has ten long years to reflect upon why appealing to invisible sky pixies instead of one's extensive professional training is often a fatal mistake. I hope he gets solitary confinement in order to better focus on it.
Also, I hope I can find out his name and which prison he's going to. I'm itching to send him a complimentary copy of The God Delusion.

The allegations of panicking and praying appear to be unsubstantiated. This thread on a professional pilot discussion forum, and this post in particular contains the following:

The last five minutes of CVR recording (the actual recording, not the transcript) was leaked and was available on the web for a brief while... There was no "praying out loud". That is a downright lie.

According to people who actually listened to what happened in the cockpit, the flight crew did their best to deal with the emergency. How about an apology, PZ?

By Graham Borland (not verified) on 25 Mar 2009 #permalink

D'oh, scratch my last two comments, I should have read the whole thread first.

By Graham Borland (not verified) on 25 Mar 2009 #permalink

The pilots didn't really pray and panic if you listen to the recordings. The pilot made the (maybe tragic) decision to ditch near some boats instead of trying to reach an airport, which they thought would not be possible. Maybe the pilots saved a lot of lives because of this decision, maybe not. Who can tell? If Sully was a little less lucky people also could have been killed.

Peter @106, are you calling #95's link a forgery then? 'Cause "Leave it, leave it.. in the name of God, most compassionate, most merciful. What's the ditching procedure?" and "no, no, the wind is strong, the wind is strong. Oh! God be clement. In name of God the merciful one, the clement one, in name of God, the merciful one, the clement one...", as well as the last part of the transcript certainly does sound like panicked praying to me. Or is your definition of praying somehow radically different from this?

Having spent 10 years in the USAF, on many occasions I listened to cock-pit recorders. NEVER NEVER have I heard anyone praying the way these jokers did.

99.9% of the time they are going through their checks and their procedures up UNTIL the VERY END.

Most American pilots last words (from my limited knowledge) say "SHIT". One in particular has always stood out to me because his last words were "GOD DAMN IT".

I was once earnestly informed that the most common last word heard in recordings of fatalities was 'Mother.'

To which I suggested that the speaker had been cut off before he could complete the utterance.

#109 I had also been earnestly informed at some point that the most common last word is "Mother". That's why I was surprised to hear "shit" repeatedly.

Along the same lines, a colleague in the RAF told me the most common last words among their pilots is something like: "Bloody Hell".

I bet your idea that the speaker had been cut off is totally accurate!

This verdict is a joke.

Having spent 10 years in the USAF, on many occasions I listened to cock-pit recorders. NEVER NEVER have I heard anyone praying the way these jokers did.

The cockpit recording is on youtube. Did you listen to it? One of the pilots occasionally mutters things like "Oh dear God" as he's vainly trying to get something, probably the engines, to start - he sounds more exasperated than panicked. At no point does it interfere with their communications with each other or with Palermo.

The the pilot very quietly under his breath says what seems to be a prayer right at the end as he's about to ditch, after he's already told everyone to hang on and there's nothing left to say - again I don't see how it interferes with his flying. At no point is there any panicked shouting of prayers like the prosecution claimed. The pilots sound a bit scared and frustrated, but completely in control of themselves.

In fact, the official report states that while it probably would have been possible to return to Palermo, it would have been very difficult - seems to me with that margin that's a judgment call the pilots have to make. Then they hit a swell the wrong way - which was just pure bad luck - same thing could have happened to flight 1549.

Bottom line these guys got railroaded and it's hard to believe that a certain amount of racism didn't play a role.

Oh, and PZ, Sully and crew didn't even try to reach a nearby airport either, as, like these guys, he made a judgment that it would be unacceptably risky, so I'm not sure what your point is there.

Dear EJ, Scroll up a little bit to #95

There is a transcription of the cockpit recorder.

Like I said, I've never heard such praying to god on any cockpit recorders. I've heard questions, answers, checklists and a little "shit" at the end. I never ever heard anyone begging for god to be good. I'm a life-long atheist. I would have noticed.

The lack of prayer in a professional cockpit during emergencies is actually pretty pronounced.

By pauzhaan@yahoo.com (not verified) on 25 Mar 2009 #permalink

All this proves is you shouldnt pray to ALLAH
when youre in trouble. Next time, try the
real savior, pilot dude.

I am a pilot with a regional airline, and I fly sometimes with a YEC captain. When I told my brother, he was worried that if something goes wrong the capt will yell "it's the rapture!"

pauzhaan@yahoo.com,

I not only read the transcript but listened to the actual audio on youtube.

Did you listen to the youtube video? Can you explain how exactly how muttering a couple of short prayers interfered with the captain's ability to do his job? You can barely hear them and they occupy a few seconds of the 5 minute video. They are no where near as extensive or intrusive as they appear on the transcript.

These are just short, rote prayers, like a Catholic saying a few Hail Marys. It may be highly unusual, if you say so, I believe you, I'm not an expert, but it's not like he's preaching a sermon or getting out the prayer rug.

It's strange that some people try to use the cockpit recording to argue that the pilots were professionally doing their job. To me they sounded like they totally lost it. I've seen several documentaries on air crashes and these featured cockpit recordings, and not one compared to this case. To me it sounded like the pilots knew the procedures were there, but just hadn't got the straightness of thinking left to actually follow them. Especially the ditching part sounded like ‘Oh no! Whatever will we do? The manual, quick... Ditching, altitude, slope, brace? What's all this text?’ The commanders of the planes from the documentary would probably have been like, ‘Altitude - x feet. Angle - y degrees. Pulling up. Angle ...’ And after listening, there was the nagging feeling that the pilots did hope god would make thigs better somehow. If that was the case, that might have influenced their risk assesment.

By Anonymous Coward (not verified) on 03 Apr 2009 #permalink

I'm having a hard time to believe that many people made so negative and biased comments without bothering to listen to the CVR.
In no way the pilots did pray instead of trying to follow the appropriate measure, these people were trained to get the most in an emergency situation and they did. The death toll or the lives saved is the result of their training in extreme situations. They had to save their lives and they did!
Blame them on anything but not for praying instead of doing their job.

A honest question to Mr. Myers
You wrote
_In this case, the Tunisian pilot panicked, and instead of _taking emergency measures or even trying to reach a _nearby airport, he instead chose to pray loudly. I'm sure _that was reassuring to the passengers.

_Sixteen people died.

_Reason gets some revenge, though. The pilot has been _sentenced to 10 years in jail for his neglect of his _responsibilities. I like that; resorting to prayer _represents an abdication of responsibility."

Is what you wrote faith or race biased?
I'm shocked that a biologist, a professor that is used to evidence based approach makes such silly and irresponsible comments.
I am outraged by the unfair character of your writing and I am concerned for your students.