Ecologist Ellis Silver says…hang on. Who? Anyone can call themselves an ecologist, so it's strange that when I tried to find out who this guy is, no one is saying. Try it. Google the phrase "ecologist Ellis Silver, and that association is everywhere -- some even refer to him as "leading ecologist" or "important ecologist" -- and many also call him "Professor Silver". "Professor" implies a university affiliation, but they never bother to state where he's employed as a professor. It's a mystery.
This cipher of a human being is saying something, as I was about to mention: he's claiming that he has scientific evidence that humans are actually from another planet, and he's written a book about it, titled Humans are not from Earth: a scientific evaluation of the evidence. Oooh, provocative. And best of all, if you are subscribed to Kindle Unlimited, it can be read for free! So I did.
You are not surprised, I can tell. It's full of really bad arguments: we are not native to earth because we get sunburns and bad backs, for instance. But essentially every creature on the planet avoids excessive exposure to solar radiation, except the ones that live in caves or the deep sea, and lots of creatures exhibit aging-related disorders -- dinosaurs included. Are we to conclude, then, that every species on the planet, from flatworm to elephant, was brought here by aliens?
That argument contradicts another one that I'll focus on: he claims that there is molecular evidence to show that humans are not related to the other animals on Earth.
Scientists working on the Human Genome Project and other DNA project have discovered an extra 223 genes in humans that do not appear in any other species on Earth. Where the heck did they come from? Some geneticists believe they were spliced into the DNA of native Earth hominids (i.e. Homo erectus) directly from the aliens themselves. (Although whether the aliens spliced in sections of their own DNA or took it from another alien species is unknown.) This resulted in the instant leap from Homo erectus to Homo sapiens (modern humans), with no missing link in between them. (I'll come back to the lack of a missing link again in the next section.)
That is just the most amazing gobbledygook. I was sitting there throwing red flags frenziedly as I read that…and it's not an exceptional paragraph. The whole book is this bad.
It is true that there are sequences in the human genome that are not identified as homologous to sequences in other species. They're called ORFANs. ORFANs are chunks of DNA that are picked up by gene recognition software because they have the standard starting sequence of a gene, and then go on for a significant length (300 base pairs or more) before they are terminated by a stop codon, but that have an internal sequence that doesn't match anything else in the databases. This is somewhat equivalent to saying that your sentence recognition software, which looks for a capital letter at the beginning and a period at the end, sometimes finds "sentences" in strings of random letters that don't make any sense. It is totally unsurprising.
Biologists aren't surprised at all by them. We have multiple explanations that don't involve aliens making transgenic monkey men. Ian Musgrave has the explanations.
Some are artifacts -- as I said, if you're just looking for starting and ending punctuation, purely by chance you're going to find strings that match your criteria in a random collection of letters.
Some are genes that have undergone so many substitions that they're no longer recognizable as the original sequence. Those would be especially interesting in an evolutionary sense, I would think, but they're rare.
Some are products of horizontal gene transfer. We don't need aliens to inject us with strange DNA, viruses do it naturally.
Some really are novel functional genes, like for instance nylonase. But again, we don't need an alien to inject us with them, but can recover function from random sequences, or chimeric genes produced by accidental fusions of other genes.
So when Ellis Silver asks
where the heck did they come from, I have to say that if he'd had even a minimally competent bit of instruction in basic genetics and molecular biology, he'd already know.
He'd also know that that number, 223, is not fixed. As we increase our knowledge by sequencing other genomes, we find more homologies -- a lot of people argue that even a few hundred genes inserted by horizontal gene transfer is a gross exaggeration, and as more data accumulates, that number keeps going down. The overwhelming majority of ORFans are simply artifacts, random occurences in the long concatenation of sloppily assembled nucleotides in our genome.
And no, I don't mean artifacts in the archaeological sense.
But even if they weren't erroneously flagged random sequences, ORFANs don't support the thesis of alien transgenic experiments. For one, every species, not just humans, have ORFANs. For another, why is Ellis Silver focused on a tiny number of genes with no known function, rather than the 20,000 that do show homology with other species, and clearly tie us to an Earthly origin?
As long as I'm wondering who Ellis Silver is, I'd also like to tag a few specific names onto
some geneticists…you know, the
some geneticists vaguely referred to as claiming that ORFANs are alien DNA spliced into Homo erectus. I've known a few geneticists in my time, and I don't know of any who wouldn't double over in laughter at that hypothesis. Silver's book doesn't cite any. I suspect that these
geneticists are as nebulous as the
aliens Silver wants us to believe in.
I don't actually believe in Ellis Silver, either. In his book, he claims to be an environmentalist and ecologist from Wisconsin who now divides his time between Texas and England, and that he is the co-founder of Silver Seas marine biology research park. No such park seems to exist. There is a Silversea cruise line, but that's as close as we get…and Ellis Silver was not one of the founders.
He also claims to be an
environmental consultant to a number of major corporations, none named, which is a bit disturbing -- this guy knows so little about biology that he shouldn't be advising anyone on the subject.
"Some really are novel functional genes, like for instance nylonase."
But isn't that example limited to a few bacteria?
I've read about widespread human genes that are only thousands of years old, but are there any which are only decades old like nylonase, and yet, have already spread to substantial populations?
Interesting (and amusing) article, I instantly realised that the mystery-man Ellis Silver's hypothesis must be dubious when I searched his name and found his hypothesis being heralded by 'Spirit Science' as a great piece of research. From my previous experience with Spirit Science (enduring a long video explaining how humans are relatives of Martians, Atlanteans and some form of bird-human hybrid) I guessed this ground-breaking discovery that humans aren't from earth after-all may be somewhat less evidence based than I had previously assumed!
The reason you can't find any information on him is because he is _not from Earth_. Duh.
It is easy to tell, by the superimposition of lop-sided space-alien eye-ovals on a photo of the North American continent, that this is a really high class operation. I think we are talking something beneath planet 9 from outer space here. Or, more likely, a ploy to help create a file of alien abduction believers to market to. Definitely a good larf for "professor" Silver, and maybe a couple of bucks in the bank for him. Though if he believes what he is writing, I would be a little concerned for whatever institution of higher book learning might have awarded him his degree.
The clay of science ignorance is soooo malleable....
I'm really not convinced that this author biography is legitimate. Digging around online, it seems his "research park" is a private facility for which he is co-director... along with his uncle. To wit, it's not a marine biology research park in any meaningful sense of the term.
There's no indication of him being on the faculty of any recognized educational institution, so I'm deeply suspect that he's a professor of anything. There are claims that he was an advisor to some unnamed TV show in Europe, but I can't find any evidence of that, and crew credits for modern productions are pretty thorough.
It's certainly possible that he's a real person. There are posts online claiming to have met him. But I don't think he has nearly the background he claims to have.
"We don’t need an alien to inject us with them..." because Nature, in its universal dimension, can alone and naturally, inject the appropriate life form with bits/genes/information not existent in their local planet. It is enough to have in this Universe some non-intelligent natural systems that are more perfect machines than apes and human bodies, as we are suspecting they exists and building theoretical models of them.
"They are called ORFANs. Called?! Who called them? Certainly it were humans, not their similars, the other genes. So, merely an word, a human word, kill the question about these 300 genes?! Oh no, it is necessary another human invention: by chance. Yes " orfans genes are produced by accident". That's just what those bacterias living inside a human fecundated ovule said about the transformations of a thing that they watched and did not know anything, from blastula to a human embryo: "Everything product of chance alone and the final product is a thing that does not make sense!"
We are now watching the Universe, from inside the Universe, as those blind bacteria. If they does not see the DNA that is driving the whole process from blastula to human embryo, we cannot see the waves of light produced by all electromagnetic radiation and configured as a Matrix/DNA that is driving the transformations from atoms to biological systems.
Even if they were really " orfans", orfans comes from parents, and parents of their species. But if the parents are genes, it is a species that is inside of millions of other species. From animals, viruses, and why not - from living forms at other planets? It is necessary to prove that the parents of orfans genes were inside humans species and not inside any other species. But... the Matrix/DNA Theory is suggesting a theoretical model of DNA that does not lives inside biological species, and so, inside astronomic and atomic species. If so, DNA is not a biological invention, it is universal: there is no natural system - living or non-living - without this universal Matrix/DNA for natural systems.
And here, as Mr. Ellis Silver and thousands of other websites/authors are being challenged by this theory, because it also suggests that humans and their DNA had a non-Earth influence, but not by intelligent aliens, and so, by single Nature. In the sky, surrounding us, registered into our DNA, there are more perfect machines than the human body, and by cosmic radiation they are penetrating everywhere life forms that have the right body's configuration. This could be the Jay Gould's "punctuated equilibrium" that explains the jump from homo erectus to homo sapiens.
I think that the Ellis Silver hypothesis is not the right one, but, I am sure also that if he’d had even a minimally competent bit of instruction in basic genetics and molecular biology, or if he go back to modern school, he will not get the right hypothesis either.
Some of the reviews are priceless:
"Four stars because he didn't go far enough."