Nine Days, Four Qubits

Stephen sent me a fun google query, discovered by one of his students:


Those are some pretty impressive four entangled qubits: sticking around for nine days without decohering :)!

More like this

The Optimizer has gotten tired of everyone asking him about D-wave and gone and written a tirade about the subject. Like all of the optimizer's stuff it's a fun read. But, and of course I'm about to get tomatoes thrown on me for saying this, I have to say that I disagree with Scott's assessment…
The APS March meeting is next week as 10000 physicists invade Portland, Oregon. I hope Powell's bookstore has stocked their science sections well! GQI, the topical group on quantum information, sponsors a good number of sessions at the meeting including sessions with invited talks, focus sessions…
(This is an old slide I used for one of my genetics classes - the general idea about what Grimace is exactly was pilfered from a graphic design school advertisement I saw where several presumably student's works were showcased. if you happen to know who the student was that originally designed it,…
Fifty years ago today, the first tiny step was taken off planet. We may be more introspective nowadays, but we sure know how to Have Fun 2.0 Here is a selection of finds from the blogosphere, trawled up over the last few weeks. Some of these were sent in, some I picked as good examples of blog…

i read this as: "it takes 9 days to entangle 4 qubits" or something.

you are now the #1 hit for "four qubits can be entangled in 9 days". Congrats!

Google is funny but the standard explanation of the effects and implications of decoherence is teh unsatisfactory IMHO. It's widespread use as a pretense for solving collapse is a circular argument with many flaws. Decoherence involves e.g. pretending that the mixture definable for a set of multiple cases (like, various runs of an experiment with varying phases each time) can be bastardized onto a given single event - "A coherent superposition becomes an incoherent mixture."

And, another nostrum is "they don't interfere with each other anymore." Well, "interference" is a global way of talking about patterns created by the superposition principle. The SP is supposed to apply in any case, even if it makes nice patterns one time and messy combinations another time - and in any case, both wave contributions continue to at least exist. So what does decoherence say happens to the other, "lost" state that used to be in combination with the first? No good answer is given.

Very low temperature?

Congrats Neil B, you are entangled in even more ways than four qubits!

Dave, that's cute but do you have a good nugget to offer in reply on the subject? Really, even Penrose has made similar criticisms...


I do not believe the decoherence solves the measurement problem, no.

Ack, my ride just showed up so I have to run.

I thought that four qubits were entangled in 6 days, and it was good, and on the 7th day the Principal Investigator rested.

But that's Theophysics as applied to Quantum Cosmology.