Via Eurekalert a poll of American attitudes toward science confirms that people are a little confused about the whole science thing. I think the most concise desription of the problem is in the second sentence:
Most (87%) rate being a scientist as one of the most prestigious careers, yet 75% can't name a living scientist.
Yep. That's your problem, right there.
(As an aside, am I the only one who sees the name of the group that conducted the study, Research!America, and thinks:
Research!America = (Reasearch)(Research-1)(Research-2)...(2)(1)(America) ?
(I am? Oh, good.)
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Chris Mooney has a link to this analysis of recent polling data. The analysis was written by David Masci. The subject: How Americans feel about science and faith. Mooney thinks the data supports the Matt Nisbet line that people like Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens hurt the cause. I…
Over the holidays, we'll be rerunning interviews with the ScienceBloggers, beginning with Suzanne Franks of Thus Spake Zuska.
What's your name?
Well, originally my name was Suzanne Franks. Then I married someone, and just because I said I wanted to, my name became Suzanne Shedd. Ten years later…
There is something about Richard Dawkins that seems to drive otherwise intelligent people completely out of their minds. Dawkins writes a book called The Selfish Gene, and some scholarly critics actually go after him on the grounds that genes can not be selfish. Then he wrote The God Delusion, a…
It was 75 degrees yesterday.
It got down to 24 today.
And pretty much everyone else in the country is under a layer of ice/snow.
But Im not gonna write about cold scientists. Im talkin about cool scientists.
Chris Mooney, the expert on facades, appearances, and stabbing people in the back with a…
(America)(2*pi*Research)^1/2 *(Research / e)^(Research)
For all large values of Research >> Procrastination
So how does that square with the 30 or so % that think science is evil because it contradicts their religion? Or is it that they don't really have a clue what science is in the first place?
It makes me think researcamericah(h-1)(h-2)...(2)
I read "Research!America" as "Research not America". I might spend too much time working with computer languages.
I agree with Dioctor Jekyll! I immediately said to myself - hey "Research not America", how appropriate!
I thought it was a UUCP path.
"While a majority (66%) say that the most important scientific research today takes place in medical and health-related fields, they also say medical progress is greatly influenced by research in chemistry (83%), computer science (62%), physics (58%), math (56%) and engineering (49%)."
Well, I certainly hope BIOLOGY is included in 'medical and health-related fields' (though I think it's not appropriate to do so); otherwise, that's a hell of an omission...
Heh. I'm with you, Doctor Jekyll and Markk. ...Although I work at a mathematical society, so I should probably make sure that no one around here finds out I jumped to the computer logic perspective instead of factorials...
Maybe they're taking their cue from pretentious band names like Godspeed You! Black Emperor?
I thought "Research Bang America".
@The Ridger: do you have a source for that 30% or so figure?
I'd bet (ok, maybe "hope" is a better word) it's actually much lower than that.
--sdc
sorry to be the contrarian, but...
Yep. That's your problem, right there
what's the problem? that fame doesn't equal respect? that seems reasonable enough to me. i think probably most famous people (and the most famous of people) are anti-role models. we should be happy with the 87%.
I can name some supreme court justices, but I can't name a lawyer, either. I can only name my own primary care physician.