Let's Hear it for Young Nerds!

The winners of the 2007 Intel Science Talent Search have been announced. First prize goes to physics, as is right and proper:

Mary Masterman, 17, of Oklahoma City, submitted a physics project to the Intel Science Talent Search describing the spectrograph system she built for $300 at home (commercial units can cost $20,000 to $100,000). Mary found that machining the parts and aligning the optics (lenses from a microscope and a camera) were particularly challenging. Her Littrow spectrograph splits light, like a prism, and uses a camera to record the resulting Raman spectra - a specific vibrational fingerprint of the molecular compound being investigated. Using a laser as her light source, Mary tested several household objects and solvents and compared her results to published wave numbers. Despite the shortcomings of the inexpensive laser, she found she could make relatively accurate wavelength measurements with her homemade device.

That's pretty damn impressive. We see lots of students who can't get relatively accurate wavelength measurements with a $50,000 commercial spectrometer...

Second and third places went to mathematical projects, fourth place to "a large-scale structural and functional protein study (proteomic approach)," fifth to a public health study, and, well, read the whole list. It would be a fairly impressive collection of work for a bunch of graduate students, and it's downright amazing from high-schoolers.

Tags
Categories

More like this

There will not be a Mark Zuckerberg action figure. After being told it can no longer sell its Apple CEO Steve Jobs action figure, M.I.C. Gadget has been ordered to kill off its Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg action figure as well. The lifelike Zuckerberg doll was available for $70 online, but now…
This year's "Flame Challenge" asks scientists to explain color in terms an 11-year-old can understand. The rules limit answers to either 300 words of text or a 6-minute video. 300 words is ridiculously short, so video is clearly the way to go. Of course, I'm not much of a video expert, but then,…
Thirty, almost forty, years ago when zebrafish were an up and coming model system and very few labs were working on them, we were used to going to conferences and reciting the zebrafish litany, a list of attributes that justified us working on such an oddball animal: we'd explain, for instance,…
In most books or articles that talk about lasers, you'll see a definition of laser light in terms of "coherence". But coherence is sort of a term of art, and the books will go on to explain coherence in terms of the waves being in sync with each other, or the emitted light being very monochromatic…

Isn't spectroscopty one of the most underrated discoveries ever? It underlies a ton of Astronomy, Chemistry, Physics at many levels, even things like Ecology. It has to be one of the final four of any experimental techniques bracket, probably the champ.

I'm (idly) wondering what makes the winner's project Physics instead of Chemistry? Not that it's really important, I'm just responding to the snarkiness of the first prize going to Physics "as is right and proper".

By Grant Goodyear (not verified) on 14 Mar 2007 #permalink

I am no end of chuffed that the winner is female and from Oklahoma. Which is probably pretty silly, but, hey, human beings are silly.

MKK

"I'm (idly) wondering what makes the winner's project Physics instead of Chemistry?"

The optics?

Even though it's used in Chemistry, the building of it would be more about Physics.

If she had made some glass retorts, flasks and beakers, that'd be glassblowing, not Chemistry.