Goals

I want to see ample funding for scientific research, or failing that, at least adequate funding for scientific research. Good experiments should not have to go begging for research funding.

I want to see funding priorities set on scientific criteria, based on what projects and programs have the best chance of improving our knowledge of the universe. Research funding should not be redirected for ideological reasons, or to benefit politically connected contractors.

I want to see research scientists protected against undue infringemetns on their academic freedom to research topics of their choosing in the manner of their choosing. There should be no restrictions on the publication or reporting of the results of research, and no restrictions on research topics other than those required to ensure ethical treatment of human and animal subjects.

I want to see science policy made on the basis of the best science available, in accordance with the relevant scientific consensus. There should be no cherry-picking of scientific results to support particular policies, or create uncertainty about the state of our knowledge.

I want to see excellence in science education at all levels, from elementary school to graduate school. Curricula should be set on the basis of scientific consensus, and should be as up to date as possible. Teaching should be in general accordance with our understanding of effective pedagogy (while allowing enough flexibility to accomodate individual teaching and learning styles). Salaries and working conditions should be improved as needed to attract and retain people with scientific training into the educational sector.

I want to see science understood and appreciated as a valuable activity, that adds to the depth and richness of our lives and culture. Science should not be seen as the exclusive and incomprehensible province of geeks and freaks and nerds, but as one of the most fundamentally human activities. The pursuit of science, broadly defined, is every bit as much a characteristic of our species as anything in art or literature, and any human is capable of doing science and understanding science.

Oh, and while I'm at it, a pony would be nice.

Tags

More like this

It figures. Some of the most interesting questions and posts showed up right before Christmas, just the time when I didn't have time to discuss and (hopefully) expand upon them. Neither, I'm guessing, did anyone else, which is unfortunate because this post was about an issue worth further…
Michael Nielsen is planning to attend an "unconference" and is considering possible topics. He quotes one from Eva Amsen: My idea: find 4 or 5 volunteers from different backgrounds to sit on a 20 minute panel and (with audience feedback) make a list of Ten Things Everyone Should Know About Science…
Lately, I've been blogging a bit about science teaching. Most of my focus has been on teaching at the secondary level, but it turns out that there are issues to be tackled with science teaching at all levels, including the college level. You'd think, then, that when a scientist who has proven…
I like to joke that in Kansas, biology is political science. Even when I'm doing job interviews outside of this grand state, people usually get the joke, or need only slight prompting to get it. I take this to be a sad commentary on the state of politics in Kansas. There is no doubt that the…

Thank you for that. (After reading so many cynical stories in the news, it's nice to see a simple statement of principle.)

Quite right, but unfortunately I think you're more likely to get the pony than most of those things. We can hold out hope and do our best to improve the general situation, but it'll be a while off yet.

In the mean time I hope you enjoy your pony.

What a wonderful statement. Given the way our government slings dollars around, funding basic/applied scientific research shouldn't approximate a "brain sucking quagmire argument." And, yeah, about that pony...