Concerned About Science

The Union of Concerned Scientists emails me fairly regularly with news items and calls to action-- one of the benefits of being a C-list blogger, I guess. This week's is a "Call your Senator" item opposing Executive Order 13422:

Government agencies need to use the best available science to protect our health--setting standards that limit toxins in our drinking water and pollutants in the air we breathe. But a recent presidential directive would give the White House excessive control over the work of federal agencies, making science more vulnerable to political interference. Unless something is done, this directive will embed political appointees inside federal scientific agencies where they could more easily prevent inconvenient science from ever seeing the light of day.

I don't consistently pass these on, but this is a marginally more reprehensible executive order than most. Scientists, even government scientists, shouldn't have to answer to political commissars before releasing their results, and it's a rare climatologist who can snap the neck of his government minder and then claim that he slipped on spilled tea just before a press conference.

My Senators are Chuck Schumer and Hilary Clinton, so it doesn't really matter much if I call them or not. If you live somewhere with more wobbly representation, you might want to drop them a line.

(This might be too late already, but what the hell...)

More like this

Under-the-Radar Politics I sure hope this doesn't sound too alarmist, gevalt, over-the-top, whatever, but I noticed a post on Integrity of Science that woke me up a little bit - before my coffee was finished brewing. (The coffee, by the way, is Trader Joe's Tarrazu; it's made in a co-op in Costa…
Disclaimer: This series of posts is not an endorsement of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. Rather, we are paying attention to Hillary because she has gone farther than any other candidate thus far in injecting science policy issues into the presidential race--and promising, if elected, to…
Tomorrowâs Science Friday radio program will feature a segment on the Science Debate 2008 campaign, which calls for the presidential candidates to devote a debate to science-related issues. You can listen live online from 2 - 4pm Eastern time, or check your local NPR stationâs listings to see when…
By David Michaels, Susan Wood, and Liz Borkowski Weâve joined with our fellow scientists and citizens to call for presidential candidates to devote a debate to an issue we havenât heard enough about in campaign appearances so far: science. The âScience Debate 2008â campaign is a nonpartisan effort…

Nice "Hunt for Red October" reference!