Speaking of quantum (as we were), I've been meaning to link to the recent Scientific American article by Chris Monroe and Dave Wineland on quantum computing with ions. This is a very good explanation of the science involved, but you'd expect nothing else, given that the authors are two of the very best in the business.
What's especially notable about this article is that either they or the graphic design people at Scientific American came up with a really excellent visual example of quantum indeterminacy and entanglement, using ambiguous cubes. It's a clever way to illustrate the phenomena involved, and I will be shamelessly stealing it the next time I need to give a lecture about this stuff.
Categories
- Log in to post comments
More like this
In which we do a little imaginary Q&A to explain the significance of Tuesday's Nobel Prize to Dave Wineland and Serge Haroche.
------------
I did a quick post Tuesday morning noting that the latest Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to two big names from my corner of the field. This would've…
Some time back, I wrote about what you need to make a quantum computer. Given that it's election season, I thought I'd revisit the topic by looking in detail at the candidate technologies for quantum computing.
The first up is Ion Trap Quantum Computing, probably the most well-established of any of…
It's been a while since I did any ResearchBlogging, first because I was trying to get some papers of my own written, and then because I was frantically preparing for my classes this term (which start Wednesday). I've piled up a number of articles worth writing up in that time, including two papers…
The 2012 Nobel Prize in Physics was announced this morning, going to Serge Haroche and Dave Wineland, "for ground-breaking experimental methods that enable measuring and manipulation of individual quantum systems". This isn't a pair that was getting much love from the prognosticators, but they're…
The ambiguous cube has been used by Monroe and Wineland for quite some time (6+ years)- it is a great visual example of both the idea of superposition and the idea of entanglement.
It's possible for one cube to be one way, the other to be the other way, to my eyes, but there are other, more significant disanalogies between this and a 2-qubit 4-dimensional Hilbert space. Complex superpositions? It seems as if the only superposition that can be presented in the ambiguous cube model is 1/sqrt(2)(|0>+|1>), or is SciAm not presenting the whole scheme? Of course it can be useful to teach by disanalogy.