Change Physicists Can Believe In

Cosmic Variance (among others) reports that 1997 Nobel Laureate in Physics Steve Chu will be the next Secretary of Energy. Sean gives a good run-down of the many reasons why this is a Good Thing.

Like Sean, I've met Chu in person. Unlike Sean, my one meeting with him doesn't shed any light on anything.

I met him at a reception at the National Academy of Sciences in honor of the American science laureates (Chu, Bill Phillips, and... somebody else). I was talking to Paul Lett, one of the permanent members of Bill's group about something or another when Chu stopped to say hi to Paul.

He was badly jet-lagged from flying in earlier that day, and mentioned that his room at the Watergate hadn't been available when he got in. Genius that I am, I said "Just tell them you're a plumber, and go on up." He looked at me like I had two heads, and I had to explain my unfunny Watergate joke. He wandered off shortly after that.

So, there you go. What that tells you about his likely policy direction as Secretary of Energy, I don't know.

Congratulations to him, and to the Obama administration for making a good pick.

Tags

More like this

I did one sketchy update from Portland last Tuesday, but never wrote up my impressions of the rest of the March Meeting-- when I got back, I was buried in grading, and then trying to put together Monday's presentation. And, for reasons that will become apparent, I was unable to write anything up…
Via Janet, the LA Times gets snooty about titles: "Ordinarily when someone goes by doctor and they are a PhD, not an MD, I find it a little bit obnoxious," Sullivan said. "But it makes me smile because it's a reminder that she's her own person. She wasn't there as an appendage; she was there as a…
A cosmologist, a science writer, three best-selling science fiction authors, a best-selling mystery novelist, and a Nobel laureate walk into a bar-- Oh, wait, that's not the opening to a joke. That's the list of people who have provided blurbs for my book... Kind of an eclectic bunch, but I'm…
I'm lecturing to our first-year seminar today about Bose-Einstein Condensation, using slides that haven't been updated since 2002. Given the pace of research in the field, that's a little crazy, so I spent a good while last night looking at pretty pictures on the Ketterle group web site, among…

I was just thinking, "Wait, where do I know that name from?" Wikipedia gave me enough clues to spark my memory of you talking about him.

What I hope this means is that Obama wants to emphasize the non-nuclear weapon part of the DOE more than it has been in the past. Seriously, I'm the last person to argue against nuclear weapons as a defense pillar, but more than a third of the DOE discretionary fund is for national security-- which in that budget means, explicitly, weapons. By contrast, the production, planning, and maintenance of actual energy is only about 15% of the DOE budget.

By John Novak (not verified) on 10 Dec 2008 #permalink

But then again, so do things that crawl under rocks Andrew ;).

I think this is an awesome pick. I guess he does have a bit of a reputation as an ass, but unless that gets him into too much trouble with the political people, I'd chalk that up as a good thing.

Woot! Steve Chu is L33t. Energy is going to be so powned.