2008 in Blogging

Because there's no better form of procrastinatory blogging than making traffic graphs:

i-05323c075d4a88ff94362377ed41607e-2008_stats.jpg

That's how you know it's Science!

Unlike the last couple of years, 2008 did not see any gigantic spikes in traffic, despite a couple of posts that I thought would really have some juice. Shows what I know.

The first half of the year pretty much fit in with a steady upward trend since the move to ScienceBlogs (see below). In early June, though, it all got to be a bit too much, and I cut way back on posting (less than half as many posts in June as in the previous few months), leading to a major drop in traffic. Things more or less recovered toward the end of the year, but overall, traffic was pretty much flat for the year.

The three highest-traffic weeks come in a clump in late March and early April. Sadly, much of that was for stupid reasons-- the only post that drew major hits that I'm proud of was What Everyone Should Know About Science (the second-most-popular post of the year). The rest of the traffic came from Talk Like a Physicist, The Framing Fracas and subsequent posts, and the "Vox Day" incident, which was the most popular single post of the year. Whee.

I posted a list of my favorite posts of 2008 a while ago, and I don't think there was anything in December that would knock any of those off the list.

In the event that you're interested in the overall traffic trend for the blog, here's the graph of blog traffic from the very beginning. Like the graph above, it's binned by week, because that seems to be about the right time scale for smoothing out completely random fluctuations while still keeping a reasonable sense of the variation:

i-225b699508ab99296be28fc54e425d04-2006-8_stats.jpg

And that's where things stand at the start of 2009. I'll post some less meta stuff next week, honest, but it seems like sort of a waste to put anything too heavy in the day between New Year's and the weekend...

Tags

More like this

When I was writing up the state of blogging post last weekend, I thought about pulling together a Top Ten Posts thing, but didn't have time. also, Google analytics moved a bunch of stuff since the last time I used it, so I had a hard time locating the right options. Having tracked it down, though,…
As a sign of what an enormous geek I am, here's what I did to pass the time while Kate was getting ready for the wedding we went to yesterday: Yes, I amuse myself by making graphs. If I knew Python, I'd be an xkcd character. Anyway, that's the monthly traffic for this blog from January 2006 (when…
Yet More Deceptive Graphs As you've probably heard, there was a horrible incident in Pittsburgh this weekend, in which a crazed white supremacist who believed that Obama was coming to take his guns shot and killed three policemen. Markos Moulitsas, of Daily Kos, pointed out lunatics like this…
Over at Faraday's Cage, Cherish has a very nice post on Fourier series, following on an earlier post on Fourier transforms in the Transformers movie. She gives a nice definition of the process in the earlier post: A Fourier Transform takes a signal and looks at the waves and then shows us the…

I stay inside my RSS feed reader as much as possible, visiting a blog site proper, only to comment. Unless there's "more below the fold".

By Matt Platte (not verified) on 02 Jan 2009 #permalink

Darn. Now I can't find the xkcd episode, which I recall as about the guy showing a big graph to the girl, and saying, while indicating a particular point with a pointer:

"This is where our relationship began to decline."

She says: "That's when you started graphing everything."

He: "Coincidence."

There are many silly graphs online, such as the famous Pac Man pie graph, or the routine use of fake USA Today graphs in The Onion

http://www.theonion.com/content/statshot/top_selling_nintendo_wii

Jonathan@2

That xkcd episode is at /xkcd.com/523

It was posted on 12-29-08.

By Michael I (not verified) on 02 Jan 2009 #permalink

Grad student runs to prof with new data. Prof rips plot from grad student's hand and explains it perfectly. Grad student takes plot, rotates it 180 degrees in the plane. Prof rips plot from grad student's hand and explains it perfectly.

An experimentalist adopting that theoretical approach would only dump his round bottom.