Physics Blogging Round-Up, New Car Edition

The big development of the week is that I bought a new car, as seen in the featured image. This ate up most of Tuesday, but I still got some quality physics blogging in over at Forbes:

-- The Basic Science Behind Creating Colors: A look at two quantum-mechanical phenomena and one quirk of biology that can be used to make people see colors.

-- Six Things Everyone Should Know About Quantum Physics: An update of an old post here, Seven Essential Elements of Quantum Physics. You can see from the titles that, in the intervening five-and-a-half years, I've managed to simplify quantum mechanics by almost 15%.

-- The One Thing everybody Should Know About Relativity: Same idea, other great theory of modern physics. Talks about how the principle of relativity can be used to understand time dilation and length contraction, the origin of rest energy, and the bending of light by gravity.

The quantum post has drawn a huge amount of traffic-- over 40,000 views, which isn't quite "viral;" maybe "bacterial"?-- but the comments are, shall we say, somewhat less on point than the comments to the 2010 post, which were really good. I miss useful comment traffic... also, get off my lawn, or I'll run you over with my middle-aged dad car.

And with that, Kate and I are off to Readercon for the weekend. If you're there, stop by and say "hi." I'm on a "panel of experts" at noon Saturday, and talking about technology vs. magic at 10am Sunday.

More like this

Blogging will continue to be minimal, as I'm buried in grading, and feeling significant time pressure regarding the book-in-progress. I thought I'd pop up briefly, though, to provide a look at the current status of the book-in-progress. The way this process works (or at least has worked for me) is…
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 6, 010101 (2010): Teaching and understanding of quantum interpretations in modern physics courses "Just as expert physicists vary in their personal stances on interpretation in quantum mechanics, instructors vary on whether and how to teach interpretations of…
In comments to yesterday's post about precision measurements, Bjoern objected to the use of "quantum mechanics" as a term encompassing QED: IMO, one should say "quantum theory" here instead of "quantum mechanics". After all, what is usually known as quantum mechanics (the stuff one learns in basic…
In which we review yet another good year of blogging, including the establishment of some ongoing series. And also a useful reality check. ------------ This great blog re-read project has been useful for a couple of reasons. First, it's reminded me that there have been long stretches of time when I…

Like it (the Forbes article) but perhaps you could've cut it down to 5 or 5½ things because QP is really only non-local for the psi-ontologists (and maybe the realist psi-epistemologists). (Neo-) Copenhagenists etc. see only unspooky correlations: http://www.mth.kcl.ac.uk/~streater/EPR.html where others see spooky non-localities.

You thought you wouldn't get crackpot science comments on a blog article posted on a site linked to Forbes?

By CCPhysicist (not verified) on 12 Jul 2015 #permalink

You're getting awful click-baitey over at Forbes, Chad. Six Things Everyone Should Know About Quantum Physics: #4 will make you call your mom and tell her you love her.

I will say that, as you've posted more there and less here, the comments here have fallen off.

On the Forbes article, there's no content on the second page. It just says "undefined".

(Why Do Solids Have Energy Bands, that is.)