Say It Ain't So: Beer Consumption Lowers Scientific Productivity

I refuse to accept the results of this study:

After years of argument over the roles of factors like genius, sex and dumb luck, a new study shows that something entirely unexpected and considerably sudsier may be at play in determining the success or failure of scientists -- beer.

According to the study, published in February in Oikos, a highly respected scientific journal, the more beer a scientist drinks, the less likely the scientist is to publish a paper or to have a paper cited by another researcher, a measure of a paper's quality and importance.

The results were not, however, a matter of a few scientists having had too many brews to be able to stumble back to the lab. Publication did not simply drop off among the heaviest drinkers. Instead, scientific performance steadily declined with increasing beer consumption across the board, from scientists who primly sip at two or three beers over a year to the sort who average knocking back more than two a day.

As they point out later in the article, this study may has several limitations. The first is that the results may not generalize. Czechs have a high rate of beer consumption, and the correlation may not apply elsewhere. Also, correlation does not equal causation. The heavy beer drinkers might have some other factor in their lives that accounts for poor performance which is also related with high beer consumption -- perhaps marital stress or difficulty in dealing with people. Finally, it could that beer consumption is the effect rather than the cause of poor performance -- the article refers to this as the "drowning your sorrows" effect.

In spite of those caveats, I have a solution to make everyone happy. Want to increase your scientific productivity? Drink more vodka.

Hat-tip: Slashdot

Tags

More like this

The NYT reports on a this article by Tomas Grim of the Dept of Zoology at Palacky Univ purporting to show a negative effect on numbers of scientific publications for scientists correlated with increasing beer consumption. According to the study, published in February in Oikos, a highly respected…
Scientists worry way too much about the impacts of our work. We want our papers to mean something, for people to really want to read them. Of course, the true test of whether your paper is important is that future papers cite you as a reference. What makes one paper cited by everyone and another…
A New York Times article has appeared about a study on the effects of excessive beer drinking on scientific productivity. The study, (Tomas Grim, "A possible role of social activity to explain differences in publication output among ecologists." Oikos 117 (4), 484-487) done by the aptly named…
What is the difference between Free Access Beer and Open Access Beer? You go to a bar to get your Free Access Beer. You sit down. You show your ID. The barista gives you a bottle. You don't need to pay anything for it - it's free, after all. You take your own bottle-opener from your pocket and…

I agree with the study completely. I was to have been the next Richard P Feynman. At the age of 19, I worked out a way to contain the heat from a controlled fusion reaction in order to obtain useable energy. Then came the service and a mind numbing series of beer drinking sessions (lasting from 1963-2002). Alas I've forgotten how I did it.

By Edward Ingram (not verified) on 20 Mar 2008 #permalink

Read the actual study. It's pretty weak and the line-fit is atrocious. I posted about it too (under almost the exact same title).

Sounds like a reasonable way to escape the burden of publishing. I'll drink to that.

By JohnQPublic (not verified) on 20 Mar 2008 #permalink