I miss the 80s, when computing manuals were illustrated with things far removed from home computing. I found this amongst my pop's old computing books.
Nowadays off-the-shelf programming software tends to be designed for a specific purpose, and I like to think that the artist here was trying to capture the infinite possibilties that lay ahead at the dawn of home computing, but perhaps I'm just being sentimental.
Wait, there's more!
Categories
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Lately I've been giving a lot of thought to a question that I'm nearly constantly asked: "So...[long pause]...are you a physicist...[long pause]...or are you a computer scientist?" Like many theorists in quantum computing, a field perched between the two proud disciplines of physics and computer…
Things have been pretty busy lately; between schoolwork, my job, and reading I've been booked up over the past few weeks, making my blogging a little less prolific than I'd normally like. Here's a quick rundown of some recent personal news, though, that either didn't fit into anything else I wrote…
Welcome to the latest installment in my very occasional series of interviews with people in the scitech world. This time around the subject is Michael Nielsen, author of the recently published Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science and prolific speaker on the Open Science lecture…
"The miracle of the appropriateness of the language of mathematics for the formulation of the laws of physics is a wonderful gift which we neither understand nor deserve." - E. P. Wigner
Our universe, or at least our understanding of the universe, appears to allow us to see its naked underbelly…
I remember owning that one. :)
This was my first programming manual.
Thank you so much for posting it! Very fond memories of it, and of my father who gave it to me.
Sinclair just seemed to have much more sense of style than the other manufacturers of the time, I think. Apple themselves were making some godawful ugly machines, IBM no better, and the best you could say about Commodore/Atari was that their later stuff was fairly inoffensive, but even the lowly ZX80 was a nice looking computer, and the original 16k Spectrum would've made Jobs proud.
This obviously extends to their manuals as well :-)
The only other thing I could personally compare it to would be a "Unix for Beginners" book that was on my own dad's shelf, which was illustrated by a simple picture of a bisected Nautilus shell... in the same warm yellow and orange shades.
Aside from that we had the a book of BBC Micro BASIC games (brown cover with a highly optimistic - though still pixilated/primary coloured! - artist's rendering of the graphics of one of them), a trio of fairly heavyweight 3rd party programmer's guides for the Atari ST which came with said machine when we bought it second hand (flat grey with fairly simple, literal illustrations on the front, e.g. a couple of isometrically drafted monitors with "BASIC" and "C" on for ... "moving from ST BASIC to C"), and the official manuals for the same machine (purely functional, with a photograph of it).
Yes absolutely. I remember being a kid and having this immense feeling of possibility when I looked at that cover, like you could get the good old Speccy to do anything! Good times, for sure!
First time I've ever seen this picture, pretty cool though! Like Pete said, I can see how this could capture the imagination as a child.
I remember the ZX Spectrum computer well but I didn't own one. I had an Amstrad 464plus (canât believe I still remember the model number)
My friend owned the ZX Spectrum and I had the Amstrad, we would argue all the time as kids on which one was the better computer. Mind you, I donât miss waiting for like an hour on a game loading.
Ha, thereâs a page on Wikipedia about the old Amstrad - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amstrad_CPC