Save the world: have a non-human baby

Ai Hasegawa, a second-year student at London's Royal College of Arts, asks if women might consider gestating something other than human children in the future, for a project entitled I wanna deliver a shark.


Ai writes:

We are genetically predisposed to raise children as a way of passing on our genes to the next generation but we live in an age where the struggle to raise a child in decent conditions is becoming harder with gross over-population and difficult environmental conditions.

We must also eat, and we are equally facing growing food shortages as a result of over-fishing, land use and a growing population. By giving birth to an edible animal it might place more value on that endangered species and help prevent it’s extinction. But, would raising this animal as a child change it’s value so drastically that we would be unable to consume it because it would be imbued with the love of motherhood?

It's an interesting idea. Although gestating our own food is a loss-making situation energetically speaking, there's a part of me that can see this catching on, in a kind of post-human world, not as a functional ecological practice but a emotional one.  After all, why adopt an animal when you can create your own?


More like this

Back at the end of November, Martin wrote a post on the ethics of overpopulation, in which he offered these assertions: It is unethical for anyone to produce more than two children. (Adoption of orphans, on the other hand, is highly commendable.) It is unethical to limit the availability of…
Industrial food production separates us from our food, increasing the distance from living thing to food product. As factories continue to import corn and export almost everything we eat, writers like Michael Pollan urge us to eat "real" food, and projects like the Slow Food movement have gained…
As presidential politics ramp up and the environment becomes part of the rhetoric, it reminded me of a essay I wrote a couple of years ago as part of book project entitled Thirty-five Years Since Earth Day: Visions of a New Generation. The editor ended up dropping the ball on the book, but my essay…
A newly produced UN Report rightly points out, among other things, that the western model of meat and dairy production simply won't work on a planet of 9 billion people. The report, which quantifies the basic unsustainability of affluent societies and the challenges facing us in satisfying needs…

Am I just stupid or is this a joke? What kind of demented person thinks of such a thing?

By Alexandra Davis (not verified) on 17 Jul 2012 #permalink

Reading this reminded me of Swift's Modest Proposal, which suggests, using quite rational arguments, that we eat our babies or sell them as food as a way of responding to overpopulation & food shortages. His ending disclaimer is that he did not have his own children so could not hope to profit from such a scheme.

By Linda Kirkman (not verified) on 18 Jul 2012 #permalink


By Margaret Burr (not verified) on 18 Jul 2012 #permalink

As Gareth from The Office says: "Will there ever be a boy born, who can swim faster than a shark?"
Here's your answer.

It would be interesting if this was the solution to saving endangered species.

By Drivebyposter (not verified) on 07 Aug 2012 #permalink