Stupid patriarchy tricks: # eleventy!

i-9dc84d4d9156dccb30d5f62466b4219a-swblocks.jpgYesterday Sheril Kirschenbaum and Chris Mooney of the Intersection announced that they were leaving Scienceblogs in favor of new digs at Discover. Unfortunately, commenters on other blogs around those parts have been behaving badly on posts welcoming the new bloggers. It appears that it doesn't matter how good a scientist and writer a blogger is, if she's female, only her appearance matters. (One more reason I only show off my footwear.)

Physioprof has an excellent (and relatively profanity-free!) post up taking apart this behavior and explaining why it is not appropriate to make your first comment on the topic of a new blog about how saliva-worthy the author is.
Here's part of what PP has to say:

It is not a "compliment". It is a hamfisted exercise of male privilege, intended to send the message to Sheril that she has entered a male domain, and that her purpose there is to play an object role in the lurid fantasies of the men who occupy that male domain.

Update: Scicurious (of Neurotopia) provides an (even better?) analysis of the affair. Here's how she sums it up:

Sure, you can tell a lady she's good looking. But to do it when she's standing up giving a scientific seminar, or when she's writing a blog post on science policy? It's not just out of context, it's rude and sexist. And when we're here, blogging to you about science, respect us (or not) for what we say. Not what we look like. You'd extend any man the same courtesy.

More like this

Earlier this week Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum moved their blog, The Intersection, over to Discover. I think it was a good move for them, but their fresh start was immediately marred by a horde of hooting numbskulls. Many others have already covered this story, but in case you haven't heard…
"I am not a pretty girl - that is not what I do."Ani DiFranco A few weeks ago, I received a facebook message. It was from a male admirer of my blog (and his fiancée, coincidentally). In it, he said "You are GORGEOUS, and your tits look absolutely incredible." I froze. I know it was meant as a…
There is an interesting post on The Intersection called Civility and the New Atheists, by Chris Mooney. In the post, Chris reviews Barbara Forrest's statements that in engaging int he cross-world-view debate (scientists vs. creationists, atheists, vs religion, etc.) one should maintian etiquette…
I generally don't bother to draw attention to intra-ScienceBlog warfare, but all hell is breaking loose as our little corner of blogosphere tries to come to grips with the wisdom of telling it like it is. I think it goes to the heart of what may be the fundamental question plaguing American…

It only takes one. Assume a monotonic decay in the incidence of the type, then calculate the time until there aren't any left.

By D. C. Sessions (not verified) on 24 Mar 2009 #permalink

I think DC is claiming that the obnoxious types are dying off, and so we just need to wait them out. Sadly, not really supported by evidence. The obnoxious types replicate.

I actually feel like I should have more children, so the (ahem, sorry in advance) narrowminded, anti-science, woo-loving, racist fundies of the world don't get the advantage. Republicans have more kids than Democrats, and liberals have less than conservatives of either stripe.

Oh, but Courtney. What if your kids turn out to be obnoxious? You can't always control it and it's something I worry about. (OTOH, I overheard my 5yo son listing off all the scientists in his family to his teacher and MOMMY WAS #1!!!)