The Buzz: Maher Receives Atheism Award

i-c3a1f948d001bbd764dedd28ca454a77-maher.jpg

Since 2003, the Atheist Alliance International has annually presented the Richard Dawkins Award to "an outstanding atheist whose contributions raise public awareness of the nontheist life stance." Past recipients of the prize have included James Randi, magicians Penn Jillette and Raymond Teller, and comedian Julia Sweeney. When it was recently revealed that the 2009 Richard Dawkins Award winner will be Bill Maher—political satirist, television host, and director of the 2008 documentary Religulous—ScienceBloggers responded with widely varying views. Orac of Respectful Insolence argues that Maher's stances on vaccination and animal rights run counter to the goal of advancing scientific knowledge, as the award's description specifies. But PZ Myers of Pharyngula and Jason Rosenhouse of Evolution Blog defend the decision, contending that Maher's contribution to the atheist movement deserves recognition.

Tags

More like this

Th Richard Dawkins award is given by the Atheist Alliance International based on the following criteria: The Richard Dawkins Award will be given every year to honor an outstanding atheist whose contributions raise public awareness of the nontheist life stance; who through writings, media, the arts…
Although I often don't agree with him and have cooled on him lately, I still rather like--even admire--Richard Dawkins. While it's true I've taken him to task for having a tin ear for bioethics, lamented his walking blindly right into charges of anti-Semitism (no, I don't think he's an anti-Semite…
Last week, I expressed my surprise and dismay that the Atheist Alliance International chose Bill Maher for the Richard Dawkins Award. I was dismayed because Maher has championed pseudoscience, including dangerous antivaccine nonsense, germ theory denialism complete with repeating myths about Louis…
The endgame is in sight. At the end of this post is a list of questions for Bill Maher tomorrow (if the opportunity presents itself), the vast majority of which you, my readers, thought of. Let's backtrack a minute. A couple of months ago, I learned that an award named after Richard Dawkins…

"an outstanding atheist whose contributions raise public awareness of the nontheist life stance."

Says nothing about scientific literacy, or lack thereof. And Bill Maher is the most prominent atheist by far that the general public sees as an atheist. And he is not shy about expressing his opinions either.

It is all very nice and tidy to require that ones' spokespeople for some aspect of your philosophy be perfectly in accord with all other aspects of yours, but hardly realistic. So what if he is on the outer fringe of nuttiness with his opinions on health? This award is not concerned with that. So I wince when he ventures beyond his domains of expertise. On Atheism, he is within his domain. That is what counts, surely.

By Gray Gaffer (not verified) on 27 Jul 2009 #permalink