Editor Does What's Right (for Wrong)

On Deltoid, Tim Lambert reports that Wolfgang Wagner, Editor-in-Chief of the journal Remote Sensing, has taken personal responsibility for the publication of a "problematic" paper and resigned his role. Wagner writes, "With this step I would also like to personally protest against how the authors and like-minded climate sceptics have much exaggerated the paper's conclusions," in stories such as "New NASA data blow gaping hole in global warming alarmism" (published by Forbes) and "Does NASA data show global warming lost in space?" (published by Fox News). On Class M, James Hrynyshyn asks "Wouldn't it be great if everyone was as good at admitting their mistakes?" Here's hoping that Wagner's move can reduce or reverse public misconceptions arising from promotion of the paper.

More like this

Wolfgang Wagner, Editor-in-Chief of Remote Sensing writes: Peer-reviewed journals are a pillar of modern science. Their aim is to achieve highest scientific standards by carrying out a rigorous peer review that is, as a minimum requirement, supposed to be able to identify fundamental methodological…
You all know about the latest dustups and new research related to climate change, including the resignation of the Editor-in-Chief of a major journal as well as some new papers about global warming. There has been so much activity over recent days that I thought a new link farm would be a good…
Wouldn't it be great if everyone was as good at admitting their mistakes? Abstract: Peer-reviewed journals are a pillar of modern science. Their aim is to achieve highest scientific standards by carrying out a rigorous peer review that is, as a minimum requirement, supposed to be able to identify…
This couldn't be more damming: the paper by Spencer and Braswell [1] that was recently published in Remote Sensing... should therefore not have been published... I agree with the critics of the paper. Therefore, I would like to take the responsibility for this editorial decision and, as a result,…

I admire Wagner's decision, but the sad thing is it will be used as "more evidence of the global warming conspiracy's power to inflict terrible punishments on anyone who questions the conspiracy". The article THEY didn't want you to see!

verry good blogs thans for you. this is dear profs. MediterraneanDiet gurser planigne thes not delter, amazing. the global warming conspiracy's power to inflict terrible punishments on anyone who questions the conspiracy yes comment...