At Cornell University, an Innovative Media Training Effort

In a letter published this past week at Science, Cornell University professors and media relations staff offer their recommendations on media training courses and activities for scientists. (The authors include Bruce Lewenstein, a member of my committee when I did my PhD at Cornell and also my MS advisor.) The recommendations are based on a media relations course for graduate students taught this past year in the Biogeochemistry and Environmental Biocomplexity program.

They open the letter by calling attention to the proposal in Congress as part of the NSF re-authorization bill to provide grants for communication initiatives in science. Here's the specifics of what they recommend:

Currently, most communication training for scientists begins after a prominent scientific discovery, and the training often occurs in a trial-by-fire style. However, a cultural shift is under way, reflecting the higher stakes of research, and an increased recognition by scientists, stakeholders, and policymakers that (i) scientists need to get their message out, (ii) scientists need training to learn how to do so, and (iii) training should begin at the graduate level.

Over the past year, we developed and recently completed a science communication course for graduate students in the Biogeochemistry and Environmental Biocomplexity program at Cornell University (funded by a NSF Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship grant). The goal of this course was to improve our ability to discuss our research with both the general public and the professionals writing and reporting on science in the media. This was achieved through a combination of guest lectures, field trips, and development of individual projects.

From this experience, we strongly encourage other graduate programs to implement science communication training. We have three key pieces of advice based on our effort that we hope will help others in their course development:

First, involve people from multiple fields across your college or university. In particular, we highly recommend involving staff from the press relations office. These specialists have a unique perspective on what topics are newsworthy and on the challenges scientists face in communicating effectively. Include scientists who have personal experience communicating their research to the public and journalists from your campus or local newspaper.

Second, visit a news room (radio, print, or television) and talk to reporters--not just science reporters, but reporters in all fields. Ask to sit in on a meeting where reporters and editors pitch stories to each other. This process reveals what stories interest reporters and how those stories are developed. Understanding this process will help scientists identify and explain the newsworthy attributes of their own research.

Third, get hands-on experience communicating science as part of the class. Do not just set up a series of lectures and field trips: write press releases, write articles, conduct interviews, get interviewed, create a Web page, and set up a science blog. Ask your collaborating journalists and PR specialists to facilitate and critique student projects. Hands-on experience with feedback from media professionals and other students provided some of the most useful learning experiences in our course.

Tags

More like this

In a letter published at Science, Cornell University professors and media relations staff offer their recommendations on media training training for scientists. The recommendations are based on a media relations course for graduate students taught as part of the Biogeochemistry and Environmental…
A bit over a month ago, "framing" was the hot argument in these parts (see here, here, and here, and links therein), with zillions of comments about how difficult it was to understand what Mooney and Nisbet were advocating. Today, Matt Nisbet appears to endorse a suggestion made in a letter to…
I'm obviously a bit late in commenting on the scientist-journalist debate that went on through last week, so I'm not going to weigh in at this point. (Round up of posts. The entry that started it all.) But for the motivated reader, below the fold are listed several studies and book chapters that I…
Next week, I will be teaming up with Chris Mooney at Cal Tech for an evening lecture followed by a day long science communication seminar for the university's graduate students and post-docs. Details are below along with the suggested reading list. Speaking Science Boot Camp Matthew C. Nisbet…

How about learning some science? How about visiting a science laboratory? How about listening to a genuine scientific discussion/debate on a scientific problem?

Ohh, it's all about learning to pitch?

By gerald spezio (not verified) on 29 May 2007 #permalink

This type of training and discussion is becoming crucial for scientists in all stages of their career. Think of what the next few generations of scientists will be like if they all go through these programs as graduate students! It is important however to not limit the communication training to simply media relations style communication. What about public outreach, informal science education in places like Science Centers, community forums, school visits and other conversations? Scientists need to be able to actually talk to all people (not just journalists) face to face about their research, it's real world implications and the process of science. This training takes on new elements relating to how people learn in these settings, working with all ages, identifying the prior knowledge of your immediate audience, etc. This type of training would certainly piggyback and complement a course like the one at Cornell. I have led a few "prototype" sessions of this sort for scientists who are planning public outreach at a Science Center and have received a great deal of positive feedback. There is an opportunity here to take this type of training as well as media relations training to the next level.