Just a pointer towards Nicolas Nierenbergs blog, which contains his critique of Oreskes. He needs some comments, so don't post here.
More like this
Back in 2008, I examined the Oreskes vs Nierenberg affair and concluded that Nicolas Nierenberg was correct and Oreskes was wrong.
Do you ever have the experience of a book you've bought from abe or ebay turning up, and you can't remember why you bought it?
My post on Nieremberg has generated lots of interesting comments. I still don't have the report, so for now I'll focus on on issue that came up: who commissioned the N report?
So often you get folks who have some brilliant theory, but unaccountably lack the courage to write the thing up and submit it for publication.
And a pointer to another blog
that wants coments...