The election

We have an alection in prospect, how exciting. I notice (well in fact *I* didn't, but someone else did and told me) that the oh-so-important climate didn't get a single mention in the Great Debate.

Speaking of which: here is all you need to know:

Or maybe you prefer digger porn?

More like this

Lincoln Chafee, Hillary Clinton, Martin O'Malley, Bernie Sanders, and Jim Webb faced off in the Facebook-CNN sponsored debate. Who won? The individual who "won" is the individual whose poll numbers went up the most, and we don't know that yet. But there are other ways to win, and other ways to…
Ed happened to beat me to this one, which I saw on Orcinus. If you want a lesson on what not to do to get elected, here it is, courtesy of Tony Zirkle, candidate for the Republican nomination to run for a seat in his House district in northwest Indiana: Don't show up at a white supremacist…
This from off in the comments at Slashdot, brought to my attention by planet3.0 (thanks VM). Yes, I know I'm a layperson now myself, but some shreds of the old knowledge still cling. Related thought: just about everyone knows they aren't able to understand, or make a meaningful contribution to,…
Every man and his lagomorph has a post taking the piss out of the "Ship of fools", so I won't bother. But (since I seem to have managed to get censored by every denialist blog I try to post on) I thought I'd make a handy list of said blogs and comments. Warning: there's no useful content anywhere…

I'm pretty sure it was agreed that the first debate would focus on domestic issues. Climate change evidently didn't qualify but I'm sure it'll turn up later. I'm looking forward to seeing David "green" Cameron justify his choice of campaign transport...

it'll probably come up in the last debate. The three aren't terribly far apart on the issue though, are they?

By carrot eater (not verified) on 20 Apr 2010 #permalink

On the whole I like the digger porn better.

[Perhaps we could decide the election by tower-climbing? Or better still, the first up "Silk" -W]

By Steve Bloom (not verified) on 21 Apr 2010 #permalink

The contrarians are right. A consensus can be wrong.

But they should have applied the remark to economics and politics when it is common, rather than science for which it is rare. The 3 party consensus is that the UK must begin a deep cut in public expenditure. New L and the LD's have roughly the same 4 or 5 year goal as the Tories, except that they want to delay for a year, which implies that they might have to cut faster once they start. The BBC has spent nearly a year accusing politicians of dishonesty, if they stop talking about big cuts.

Its not as if this has been proved. Someone who disagrees is Professor Danny Blanchflower? He is not even far left.

This is all I can find for now:

It looks as if UK Science is going to be a casualty, by consensus . I don't expect the BAS and similar places will be immune.

By deconvoluter (not verified) on 24 Apr 2010 #permalink