The Magnificent Disinformation Engine

A better title for this post would be "cite your sources" but I need to mirror The Magnificent Climate Heat Engine at WUWT. Guess what? Just a few days after totally missing the importance of heat transport within the climate system WE has finally noticed it. WE read my posts, of course, because several people pointed him at them in the WUWT comments, although he was careful not to engage with those. So he's managed to learn something from me, which is good, but doesn't have the basic honesty to acknowledge that, which is effectively plagiarism, which is expected.

Naturally, he doesn't link this back to his previous post, because to do that would be to point out that his new discovery has totally destroyed his previous, which would be embarrassing. It will be interesting to see if any of the commentators there are both awake and bold.

More like this

Continuing in from Comments elsewhere which has faded into the dust of past ages. Timmy elsewhere but really on If the MWP Was Global What Does That Tell Us About Climate Change Now? wherein Timmy is clueless about climate science. > From which the takeaway point is that perhaps climate…
Its shooting fish in a barrel, of course, but you must go and read Another uncertainty for climate models – different results on different computers using the same code [WebCitation]. The issue here is a well-known one - it dates back to Lorenz's original stuff on chaos. That trivial differences…
[May 26th: Pulled to the top to update with the Nature editorial which, as well as noting the paper being pulled, also notes the mysteriously dilatory George Mason University investigation. June 3rd: And pulled again, since Science have a piece on the actual retraction, and again note the GMU lack…
As used on this blog, and sometimes elsewhere. This post will be a work in progress, probably. I said that I would occaisionally push the publication date closer to "now" to keep it near the top, but that doesn't work: wordpress changes the URL to include the month so old links break. Rats. [[link…

Did you notice Willis's response to the comment about climate scientists taking note of this common sense approach? Rather ironic given that it does indeed appear to be a "correction" motivated by your earlier post.

By And Then There… (not verified) on 22 Dec 2013 #permalink

hunter says (December 22, 2013 at 5:11 am): "Willis, Nice summary. How does this compare with what previous climate scientists have said? In particular, Dr. Spencer?"

No answer yet.

By Victor Venema (not verified) on 22 Dec 2013 #permalink

If one thinks objectively..you would ask how many cars planes trucks airplanes factoriesoil and gas burning devices and humans were there on earth 100 years ago? So some would have you believe this much exhaust released into our world has no effect on climate? I would say that would be a person who holds alot of stock in oil coal and gas etc. These individuals are often brain washed by lush dimbaugh type radio and focus on political arguing not science.G-d save us from bread and circus solutions...Shalom jim ainoris

By james ainoris (not verified) on 22 Dec 2013 #permalink