There is no land on an aqua-planet

Something of a classic, from Richard Telford. He's discussing Soon's Heartland presentation. Here's a screenshot:


Soon is trying to point out the importance of the value of the solar insolation, which he believes needs to be heavily fiddled to make the GCMs come out right. To prove this, he's chosen a paper about an aquaplanet experiment. Aquaplanets themselves are a perfectly respectable thing to do: they offer you a heavily simplified "planet" with no irritating land-sea constrast, or orography, to get in the way of your dynamics (it also simplifies the variability, so you get regular results over much shorter time periods). Soon wants to emphasise how unrealistic the temperature is, so he pulls out the highest global average value - 35 oC - and then adds a made-up 3 oC on top of that to get an entirely fictitious 38 oC.

Its not really clear if Soon is deliberately lying, or just clueless, but denialist drivel doesn't get much worse.

[Update: so, the WAPO says the Smithsonian says Soon is “a part-time researcher at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory,” and the institution is “greatly concerned about the allegations surrounding Dr. Willie Soon’s failure to disclose funding sources for his climate change research.” The acting secretary of the Smithsonian, Albert Horvath, “has asked the Smithsonian Inspector General to review the matter.” There's a twit-pic of this but oddly the Smithsonian press page doesn't have it (archive). But their FB page does (h/t Eli).]


* Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Hi-Jinks1 - Eli.
* Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Hi-Jinks 4- Eli again.

More like this

The Willie Soon Story broke on Saturday night, having cloned off the front page of the Sunday New York Times into a few secondary sources. But we all saw it coming. Since then there has been quite a bit more written and there will be quite a bit more. The main thing I want to add to the…
The following statement was issued this afternoon by the Smithsonian: Smithsonian Statement on Willie Soon, researcher at the Smithsonian Astrophysics Observatory. The Smithsonian is greatly concerned about the allegations surrounding Dr. Willie Soon’s failure to disclose funding sources for his…
The Willie Soon Controversy There’s been a lot of talk about the Willie Soon Controversy. Bottom line: Soon was an author on a paper that failed to disclose his extensive funding by the petroleum industry and its friends (over a million dollars to date, I believe) as required. I don’t have time to…
And by "me" I mean all the children of future generations. Willie Soon is a soft-money scientist at Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics who has been producing highly questionable 'science' casting, for several years, faux light on the reality of the human caused process of global warming…

Don't let Soon's throes eclipse Mike Rampino's latest MBRAS paper, which takes galactic climate forcing far beyond the realm of mortal bafflegab.

Not that that will stop Watts and the rest of the usual suspects, including Lubos-- this time string theory actually comes into play ! .

By Russell Seitz (not verified) on 23 Feb 2015 #permalink

Thanks, Eli- I was away on business in the Oort Cloud at the time.

By Russell Seitz (not verified) on 23 Feb 2015 #permalink