Speaking of Washington (State that is)

Slashdot reports, that the Seattle PI reports, that:

Beginning next month [June 7th], Washington residents who play poker or make other types of wagers on the Internet will be committing a Class C felony, equivalent under the law to possessing child pornography, threatening the governor or torturing an animal. Although the head of the state Gambling Commission says it is unlikely that individual online gamblers will be targeted for arrest, the new law carries stiff penalties: as much as five years in prison and a $10,000 fine.'

So, poker is equivalent to "child pornography, threatening the governor or torturing an animal" ... I always thought that Ed Brayton was a shifty s.o.b.

And if they are not likely to target individual gamblers, who is the law aimed at? The marmots who, after a long day torturing cats, like to unwind with a few hands of Hold Em?

More like this

And I mean the state of Washington, not Washington DC. Well, this time anyway. Next week their new law banning internet gambling goes into effect and anyone caught playing poker online could face penalties equivalent to those who are caught possessing child pornography. No, I'm not making that up,…
Via Radley Balko comes these two reports. The first is from Arkansas, where a bill has just passed both houses of the legislature that would ban smoking in any car if there's a child in the car. And the Arkansas governor loves the idea: Huckabee said Friday afternoon that the bill sounded like a…
I've written before about Washington's new law against internet gambling, one of the most obnoxious and hypocritical pieces of legislation imaginable. Remember how they assured everyone that they didn't intend to go after the players with this law? Apparently that's because they were planning to go…
I've been doing a bit of research, spurred by this article by Allyn Jaffrey Shulman, on the legal status of online poker. And I've found that most of what Shulman says is spot on. She points to a Federal court ruling in the case of In re Mastercard International, the full text of which can be found…

They could publish a list of offenders and where they live (thus making it easier to get a night of cards going).

Which would be okay with them, since the whole point of this law is to keep all that gambling money in the state.

We've heard it all in the fight to legalize slots at Maryland race tracks. There's the "gambling is wicked" crowd, but the loudest voices in favor weren't saying "gambling is wholesome", they were saying, "all that money is going to Delware!"