A Comedic Break

I like Bill Maher. On Saturday he's playing here in Phoenix, and we'll be there. Here he is on Leno doing some good stuff on Mel Gibson etc.

Tags

More like this

Live blogging the Obama Infomercial .... so you don't have to. (see this, this, this) Wheat .... Flags .... Fans in slow motion. Children and uncertainty. Ooops. He's standing in a room thta looks a little too presidential, Kennedy eskqe. Looks good but a little OTT. Please, Barach, don't be…
Oh, boy. As many of you already know, the big AAI conference is taking place in LA at the end of this week — I'll be there! — and they are giving Bill Maher an award. This is a problem. Maher made a provocative movie about religion this year, Religulous, and that's the kind of thing we want to…
It just so happens that I was up quite late last night doing--what else?--writing yet another grant application (well, two actually). Even though the grants aren't due until Wednesday, Tuesday happens to be my operating room day, meaning I need to get this done and buried by tomorrow afternoon at…
Prepare yourselves, Arizona! John Lynch, GrrlScientist, and I will be wafting into Phoenix tomorrow, and here's a short version of our busy calendar: All week: Science! I'll plan on posting updates about various cool things I learn, as I'm sure my SciBlogs colleagues will also do. Friday, 6ish:…

Maher's "New Rule" on ID prompted author and evangelist Ray Comfort to issue this challenge to him on May 10, 2006: "I can scientifically prove intelligent design. Let's have 20 minutes each. I present my case (I won't even mention 'faith') and then he can present his case for evolution. I say that he doesn't have one. He's bluffing. I don't mind if he spends his 20 minutes telling jokes, because that's all he has." An online petition calling for the debate has a puny amount of signatures on it. Why would Maher bother anyway when all he has to do is invite Ann Coulter back on his show?

Good link!
I was struck by the contrast between Maher's forthright defense of science vs. ID and his (earlier cited) apparent embrace of pseudoscience vs. medicine. He is right about ID, but his track record makes me wonder if he has, on this occasion, been right by accident.