"You have a board in Kansas that is so extreme"

Reuters is reporting:

The Kansas Board of Education on Tuesday threw out science standards deemed hostile to evolution, undoing the work of Christian conservatives in the ongoing battle over what to teach U.S. public school students about the origins of life. The board in the central U.S. state voted 6-4 to replace them with teaching standards that mirror the mainstream in science education and eliminate criticisms of evolutionary theory.

Predictably, the Discovery Institute is not happy:

"You have a board in Kansas that is so extreme," said John West, senior fellow at the Discovery Institute, adding that evolution supporters were "anti-religious."

So "extreme" that is mirrors the mainstream.

Read more DI-crapola here, while Pat Hayes over at Red State Rabble has more from a pro-science perspective.

More like this

In case you've not heard, several the pro-science candidates for the Kansas Board of Education were victorious in the primary election last night. If current results hold, it looks like the creationists on the 10-member Kansas Board of Education have lost two seats in the Republican primary. The…
Yesterday, Rick Perry commented "in Texas we teach both creationism and evolution in our public schools, because I figured you're smart enough to figure out which one is right." It got a lot of play, including my own post on the matter. PolitiFact Texas examined the issue, providing a nice…
Sunday's New York Times had a fascinating article about the growth of local citizens groups to fight the ever-increasing challenges to evolution in public schools. I found this of particular interest because I co-founded one of those groups, Michigan Citizens for Science, 3 years ago. We are…
This morning the Kansas State Board of Education is all shook up. Last year the board voted 6-4 for much-criticised, creationism-friendly science education standards. Yesterday the primaries for the board elections took place, and on balance, the science-standards bloc lost two seats to Republic…

It's the usual religiobabble: "evolution is anti-religious" re-defines the argument into "motherhood" terms: "You can't be against religion, can you?" Well, yes, I can, but religion and evolution have nothing to say to each other. Stephen Jay Gould was on to something when he talked about Non-overlapping Magisteria. I peeked at Uncommon Disorder the other day and found them flogging the usual dead-horses-not-even-in-the-race of abiogenesis and cosmology, as though a gap in our knowledge there could invalidate speciation. Keep up the good work, Stranger!

But..but ...but... I thought ID was about science, not religion!

Why do these people keep confirming the wisdom of the Dover ruling?

Cheers.

Had the Kansas Board of Education reached its decision 24 hours before, on Darwin's birthday, I'm sure the IDers would have collectively had one extreme hissy fit. In any case, it's good that rationality won out this time around.