1. strangerfruit
  2. A new date for chimp/human divergence

A new date for chimp/human divergence

By jlynch on February 24, 2007.

i-c8b2b6d0c0069c5b0df705ccba897ab6-homdates-tbn.jpg

According to this paper, a hidden Markov model of the divergence between humans and chimps finds "a very recent speciation time of human-chimp (4.1 ± 0.4 million years)". This would put the last common ancestor with Pan after a previously
reported date of between 4.98 and 7.02 million years. (TimeTree reports the weighted average for the time of nuclear divergence to be 5.56 million years). The age of 4.1 million years would apparently put the split during the time of such taxa as Australopithecus anamensis, A. afarensis and Kenyanthropus platyops. It will be interesting to see how this affects our current understanding of hominid evolution.

Ref: Hobolth A, Christensen OF, Mailund T, Schierup MH (2007) Genomic Relationships and Speciation Times of Human, Chimpanzee, and Gorilla Inferred from a Coalescent Hidden Markov Model. PLoS Genet 3(2): e7 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030007

Tags
Human Evolution

More like this

Phylogeny Friday - 27 April 2007
This week's phylogeny comes from this paper on molecular dating of speciation events. I won't be addressing molecular dating per se, but I will be dealing with what molecular clocks tell us. Like, do they actually reveal the speciation time of a pair of species? The divergence date of a pair of…
A tiny bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing
Good news! The gorilla genome sequence was published in Nature last week, and adds to our body of knowledge about primate evolution. Here's the abstract: Gorillas are humans' closest living relatives after chimpanzees, and are of comparable importance for the study of human origins and evolution.…
Important papers on recent human evolution
This post is more of a personal note...here are three papers that are really cool must reads: Williamson SH, Hubisz MJ, Clark AG, Payseur BA, Bustamante CD, et al. (2007) Localizing Recent Adaptive Evolution in the Human Genome. PLoS Genet 3(6): e90 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030090 Voight BF, …
Ancient "Big Man" Confirms That Humans Stood Tall Early
The skeletons of Lucy (left) and Kadanuumuu (right). Both belong to the early human species Australopithecus afarensis. (Images not to scale.) I never fully appreciated how small Lucy was until I saw her bones for myself. Photographs and restorations of her and her kin within the species…

A date was revised! Let us all put on sackcloth and ashes, for surely this means that evolution is false!

You know that certain elements of society will claim just that.

This is very careful and impressive work.

I absolutely hate to think of what the Creationists and Intelligent Designers will do to spin it, based on their hopeless misunderstandings and intentional dishonesty.

"It will be interesting to see how this affects our current understanding of hominid evolution."

Setting aside for a moment my limited mathematicalBiology credentials, I see this as a science fiction author: What does it mean to be Human?

What did it mean when various hominids walked the earth?

What did it mean when there were different species of "people" of the Cromagnon, Neanderthal, Java man varieties? And on Flores island?

And what will it mean when our descendents spread through the galaxy and become a clade with rapidly varying morphology from planetary conditions (Larry Niven) and weightless conditions (Bruce Sterling) and the like?

And what are the implications on how closely related chimps and gorillas are to us, in the priority of conservation efforts -- i.e. absolutely banning "jungle meat" trade? And on the ethics of chimps in medical research?

Again, the science itself is wonderful. And the implications are enormous.

Hmmm. When I saw the title, I thought that your post was going to be a prognostication about when it would happen.