Did Klaus-Martin Schulte plagiarize his response to Naomi Oreskes from Christopher Monckton? Looks like it. You be the judge.
Is Monckton hanging around the comments of this blog, trying to scare people. Looks like it. You be the judge.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Because swatting the climate change denier gnats is an endless task, we are glad to help our SciBling John Lynch provide the swatter for yet another boring attempt to breach the walls of scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change. In 2004 Naomi Orestes, a fine historian of science known…
Via William Connolley I find another attempt to claim that there is no consensus in the scientific literature:
In 2004, history professor Naomi Oreskes performed a survey of research papers on climate change. Examining peer-reviewed papers published on the ISI Web of Science database from 1993 to…
This sounds so familiar. A few years ago, a historian of science, Naomi Oreskes, reviewed the literature on climate change and concluded that there is a unanimous consensus in the published work that anthropogenic carbon is a major contributor to global warming. Now a denialist has re-analyzed…
Many readers will no doubt know the 2004 paper in Science by historian of science Naomi Oreskes, a paper which discussed the consensus position regarding anthropogenic climate change. Predictably, the paper received much vitriol from the climate contrarians and denialists. Now, a medical research…
And it turns out, after all this, that E&E says they do not intend to publish the Schulte piece...
http://www.desmogblog.com/schultes-analysis-not-published-not-going-to-…
Hi everyone,
Rarely do I ask, I only save it for special occasions, when I think it is really important that the word get out to as many people as possible, and I think this is one such occasions.
Please take 10 seconds and vote for this story on Digg.com.
Thanks for posting this story John!
- Kevin@desmogblog.com
Here is the fixed Digg link. -jml