Are you a "progressive"?

Mike Dunford has linked to a CAP poll for measuring political ideology. What can I say, I'm procrastinating, so I answered the questions and scored 344 out of 400. That makes me a god-damned baby-eating liberal pinko scumbag "extremely progressive." Below is the mean score by group:


I have yet to read the CAP report on American political opinion but here's a link none-the-less.


More like this

The Center For American Progress recently released the results of a political positions survey. They asked respondents to rate their level of agreement with 40 questions on a scale of 0-10, with 0 at the 'disagree' end of the spectrum. They converted each person's responses into a numerical value…
Zeno sent me this: It certainly encapsulates what I hear when Republicans open their mouths. Who in their right mind wouldn't oppose baby-eating monkeys from outer space? Probably those same bastards who hate our troops and want the terrorists to win.
Not the greatest litmus test, but kinda fun and interesting. I'm more conservative than I thought. I was sure I'd get "Raving Atheist Baby-Eating Level Liberal"........ Your Political Profile: Overall: 25% Conservative, 75% Liberal Social Issues: 25% Conservative, 75% Liberal Personal…
Darwin had his bulldog. Apparently Dembski now has his daschund. Ann Coulter is apparently now the kinder gentler machine gun hand of the Wedge. Ann is taking Phillip Johnson's message as developed in DARWIN ON TRIAL and REASON IN THE BALANCE and bringing it home to the masses. Critics will dismiss…

I scored a 349/400. But then I know that they also had a conservative test and I scored something like 27 on that one.

I recieved a score of 357.
That makes me Extremely Progressive a Gotdam commie pinko baby killin' fagboy... as per some of my neighbors.

By alcoolworld (not verified) on 14 Mar 2009 #permalink

Interesting. I scored a 282, making me "very progressive". Can't say I'm surprised.

Why weren't there more questions on science and society, and more important - why is science considered partisan?

333, and I used to be Republican. Now I'm unaffiliated, unrepresented, and disenfranchised.


I think my score would have been higher (better!) if it weren't for the hidden bias in the first question.

Government should not be ensuring that healthcare is "affordable."

Affordability should not be an issue when it comes to guaranteeing human rights, such as the right to healthcare access. (Which happens to be where Obama is really screwing up and wasting his political capital right now.)

I got a 217 (which is higher than I expected) Probably because I lean libertarian and support a free market economic model but am also radically pro individual freedom and anti militarism (beyond what is directly required for defense of the US)

341. Seems pretty consistent with me being a Canadian.

310/400 "extremely progressive"

I'm always annoyed with these online political and personality tests, because they offer mainly binary answers.
Posing a question which you may think has no political relevance and then asking for a yes/no agree/disagree reply.

375/400. Dual national living in the UK.

367. Guess I need to pack my bags for Leningrad....oh wait. Never mind.

... why is science considered partisan?

Because we live in a world of finite resources, and the Reaganites want everyone to believe in infinite wealth.

I got a score of 170. Does this mean I am a fascist? But I am a lesbian and I watch The View (I love me some Joy Behar, hate that Hasselbeck biatch!) and I voted for Hillary âHill-dogâ Clinton in the primary! I also love The Huffington Post (or HuffPo as I like to call it). Can lesbians even be fascists?! Isnât that impossible or something?

By Anonymous (not verified) on 27 Apr 2009 #permalink