More Dawkins in Oklahoma

The Dawkins @ Oklahoma debacle continues. As Greg Lukianoff correctly notes:

Think about it: If every time a student or faculty member invited, say, Rick Warren to speak on campus, they knew they would be subjected to a thorough and time-consuming investigation by state officials, you can all but guarantee that schools across the country would think twice before inviting Rick Warren. This would be a great way for state legislatures to chill speech they dislike without ever having to find the speaker guilty of a single thing. Talk about your un-American activities.

Given the fact the legislature clearly is concerned with nothing other than Dawkins' viewpoint, such an investigation is improper and should end immediately.

It's nice to know that the Oklahoma legislature has nothing better to worry about.

Update: Abbie notes that "EXPELLED star Ben Stein spoke last fall at the Oklahoma State University to the tune of $60,000, and no one seems to have cared at such an expense to 'the tax payers'."

Tags

More like this

Is this is what Creationists mean when they put forth 'Academic Freedom' legislation? Sure enough, I just received confirmation today in a letter from the Open Records Office at the University of Oklahoma. The letter confirms that on the day of Dawkins' speech, Oklahoma State Representative Rebecca…
Those creationists sure do love their hypocrisy: on one day, they whine about their version of "academic freedom", which means demanding that creationism be given equal time with legitimate science in the classroom, and the next they throw a hissy fit because someone they disagree with is speaking…
I had been having thoughts regarding the larger context of Richard Dawkins' visit to the University of Minnesota (in which he gave this talk), and the socio-political context of this visit, but had not decided if I would write about them. Then I read, at Pharyngula (the other Minnesota…
It's been confirmed: members of the Oklahoma legislature are investigating the suspicious circumstances of Richard Dawkins' lecture. After all, what possible excuse could UO have for inviting a known rabblerouser who doesn't happen to believe in gods? Other than his reputation as a world-famous…

This is just political grandstanding, but sets off my free speech spidey sense. I don't know what whats more disheartening. The fact the State of Oklahoma would try something this absurd, or that I'm sure there will be no real public backlash.

TheNewAtheist
www.thenewatheist.com