New pharmacy student blog: introducing Secundum Artem

As a pharmacy professor, I've been surprised at how few blogs out there are written by pharmacists or pharmacy students. In my subjective observations, there are tons of blogs written by physicians and nurses. There are about 200,000 registered pharmacists in the US, about one-fourth the number of physicians so it's not as though pharmacists are terribly outnumbered by other healthcare professionals.

So, it was with great pleasure that I stumbled onto Secundum Artem via a comment by the author, N.B., in a thread on Respectful Insolence.

Secundum artem is a Latin phrase meaning "according to the art." It is frequently used to doing something in the accepted manner of a skill or trade; in medicine, it is often taken to mean "use your skill and judgment."

Okay, I'm a softie for anyone who takes their blog name from the Greek or Latin. What can I say?

In what appears to be N.B.'s inaugural post, he takes on the slight modifications or purifications drug companies have made in drug composition to prolong patent life, using the comparison of the antidepressants citalopram and escitalopram (the latter composed of just one of the isomers comprising the former):

Escitalopram, for the curious, is the popular antidepressant Lexapro. By purifying the S-form from what chemists call the "racemic mixture" (the 50/50 mix of both forms), Forest Pharmaceuticals gets to call what they've cooked up a "new drug" and has an exclusive patent on their creation for about the next 20 years. Joy! Studies do suggest that Lexapro works a little better than Celexa, and that it's slightly better tolerated, but it's also pricier because it's currently brand-name-only: $80.31 for 30 tablets of the 10 mg strength vs $39.99 for the roughly equivalent generic citalopram 20 mg tablets. It might be worth the difference. It might not.

Heck, I'm impressed with any pharmacy student who remembers enough of their medicinal chemistry to actually use it in the context of an economic drug comparison. In continuing this discussion, N.B. suggests to drug reps and the companies they represent:

Don't come to me and tell me how awesome your drug is unless you're prepared to prove it. And if your drug really isn't all that awesome, quit telling me how awesome it is. The FDA may have approved it because you demonstrated it was better than placebo with studies that showed statistical significance, but don't hype it up when we're talking about 5% absolute gains. I realize that it's the job of people who do marketing to get way more excited about their products than is rational, but this is medicine. That just won't do here.

Despite all of my criticisms about the direction pharmacy education has taken in the last 15-20 years, I still contend that a well-trained pharmacist who continues to care about the core content of their profession is one of the most valuable members of the healthcare team. Some physicians I know tell me that keeping a good relationship with their clinical pharmacist is their secret weapon in objectively staying on top of drug usage trends.

If the first few weeks of Secundum Artem is any indication, this is a pharmacy student you should watch.

By the way, I'd like to put up a "Pharmacy" category on my blogroll sidebar. If you have any experience with good blogs written by pharmacists or pharmacy students, please suggest them in the comment thread. Thanks!

More like this

As I sat to write a post this morning, I became more engaged in a story in the New York Times magazine by Dr Daniel Carlat entitled, "Dr. Drug Rep." Joseph of Corpus Callosum recently commented here about being solicited to recommend fellow physicians in the local area and nationally who he…
A while back I started a series about the science and logic (and other factors) involved in the selection of antidepressant medication.  I suppose I could put in the pinks to the first four parts, but anyone can use the search box in the left-hand sidebar to search for "selection of…
Two weeks ago, Canadian Skeptics United published on their Skeptic North site a piece by an Ontario pharmacist criticizing a proposal by the province to grant limited prescribing rights to naturopaths. The essay, which was reprinted in the National Post on Tuesday, outlines the intellectual and…
Sharon Begley has an excellent Newsweek cover story on the rise and fall of anti-depressant medications, or how a class of drugs that were once hailed as medical miracles are now seen as barely better than placebos: In just over half of the published and unpublished studies, Kirsch and colleagues…

Wow! I just happened to be checking out the blogosphere this morning and I noticed this post. At risk of sounding overly worshipful, the idea of a prominent scienceblogger tracking back to my blog and welcoming me in such a manner is an incredible encouragement.

I hope to continue providing quality posts to the blogosphere in the future!

Oh, and since you asked for quality pharmacist bloggers, I'd have to say that my personal favorite is probably Jim Plagakis, who you might know from his articles in the well-known pharmacist publication, DrugTopics.

His blog is located at http://jimplagakis.com and is also linked in my blogroll sidebar.

A lot of other pharmacist blogs are essentially pharmacists whining about their jobs, something I'm hoping to avoid--maybe that's why there are so few well-known pharmacy blogs.

Worship all you want, chief - just keep up the great writing.

I'm just another blogger trying to keep the pharmacology torch alive. Encouragement from other like-minded bloggers is what got me started and keeps me going.

I think times have changed since this blog post! The Angry Pharmacist has a hugely popular blog, and I have seen lots of pharmacy school student blogs popping out all over the nation.