I am reliably informed that a book I wrote during 2008 - The Great Dinosaur Discoveries (A & C Black, 2009) - is now out and available in the shops.
If you like my stuff you will, hopefully, want to own a copy: it's high quality, very nicely illustrated, and not all that expensive. While dinosaur books are typically arranged in either phylogenetic or geological fashion, my aim with The Great Dinosaur Discoveries was to show how our knowledge and understanding of dinosaurs has itself evolved over the decades. This sort of thing has only really been done a few times before. Ned Colbert looked at the history of dinosaur science in his 1969 Men and Dinosaurs, and John Gilbert did likewise in the extremely poorly known Dinosaurs Discovered (Hamlyn, 1979). Desmond's The Hot Blooded Dinosaurs is also notable for its strong historical narrative.
Anyway, while I was planning to write at great length about the book and its contents, I just haven't had time. For now I'll note that I tried to include a lot of stuff in the book that hasn't been covered much before. In addition to such familiar subjects as Osborn and the discovery of Tyrannosaurus rex, Janensch and the Tendaguru sauropods, and Nopcsa's Transylvanian dinosaurs, I also included such things as the recognition of heterodontosaurids, the discovery of Pelecanimimus, alvarezsaurids, scansoriopterygids and Asian lambeosaurines, the 'dinosaur renaissance', Holtz's 'tyrannoraptor' hypothesis, and something that I've termed 'the South American sauropod explosion'.
When I have discussed 'familiar' subjects, I've tried to include as much unfamiliar material as possible: as an example, the section on the discovery of Iguanodon includes virtually unknown data on William Bensted's substantial contribution on the 'Mantel piece', while the spread on Barnum Brown's publication of Ankylosaurus discusses how he used parts of the stegosaur skeleton to fill in his reconstruction. Inclusion of data on the new CT-imaging work produced by the Witmer lab, and mentions of Skorpiovenator, Stokesosaurus langhami, Austroraptor and others, mean that the book is as up-to-date as we could make it. In addition to some fantastic photography, the book also features art by Todd Marshall, Julius Csotonyi, Luis Rey, Davide Bonadonna and others. I might be biased, but I think it looks awesome.
Alas, constraints meant that a huge number of planned spreads had to be axed, and the volume was originally going to be substantially more complete and representative. Inevitably there are a few mistakes, including some real howlers (the Triassic is in the Palaeozoic now? Yikes). But let's not worry about those details. If you like the book, then please consider posting a review on Amazon. If you don't like the book: well, the thing about dinosaur books is that there are an awful lot of them, so go find another one.
Order the book: Great Dinosaur Discoveries.
- Log in to post comments
I got a review copy just before I left for Utah & Wyoming last month. It really is a beautifully-illustrated book and what I read of it is quite good. (It is good to see Huxley's work with dinosaurs get addressed in a little more detail, in addition to everything else.) I'll have a review up soon on Dinosaur Tracking, as well as one for Scott Sampson's forthcoming Dinosaur Odyssey.
Your poistings are always intersting and insightful, so I will certainly look it up and purchase and/or get from library - or both.
Another must have book, cangratulations Darren.
And to get a signed copy?
Kai, I plan on getting my copy signed as SVP! :-)
It really is a wonderful book. It reads like a series of Tet Zoo articles. The only two things I don't care for are the "Illustrated Encyclopedia of Prehistoric Animals" clipart (see: Segnosaurus) and the occasional time-warping the book does. For example, pages 90-93 discuss the years 1960-1989, as though the next section of the book is dedicated to that era, and the very next page discusses Dilophosaurus, discovered in 1942. ;-)
But don't let those minor gripes fool you. Darren has penned a fantastic tome, here.
Looks great. I will get a copy when the university semester ends and I am no longer a poor student :P Your advice about what to do if I don't like the book made me lol.
In the shopping cart!
Errr... as someone who has just recently determined to do paleoart, can I ask how the process went? Did you have direct influence on the artwork? Was it a one-off feedback loop or more engaged discussion? Did you act as editor in any way?
Zach: the photos look gorgeous. I'll have to wait to get the book and check out Segnosaurus, but... what is it that makes an illustration look like clip-art?
John Noble Wilford's The Riddle of the Dinosaur (1985) also mostly concentrates on history of dinosaur paleontology.
Congratulations. And there was I was just thinking that my personal library is seriously short of dinosaur books!
It looks like a beautiful book, can't wait to read it. When I get it I'll post a lengthly review at Amazon. But that non-sprawling Microraptor is worrying me...
Looks excellent! A good balance between beautiful images and highly informative text. Very appealing book.
Well done. I'm sure it's an excellent book and will be a Christmas present for many children this year.
Congrats Darren! Something to definitely add to my wish list
I am by no means close to being a biologist, but I like dinosaurs and read what I can understand of the Tet Zoo, which I like (obviously, since I'm here). So, I'm wondering, is this book accessible to a general audience, or should I get a degree in palaeontology first? :-)
My copy has been mailed by Amazon, being delivered by Pterosaur express.
"So, I'm wondering, is this book accessible to a general audience, or should I get a degree in palaeontology first? :-)"
Although I havn't got my copy yet, from what I can tell it's a book layfolk can readily understand. Try Greg Paul's Dinosaurs of the Air for a book you'd need a PhD to make sense of it :-)
"My copy has been mailed by Amazon, being delivered by Pterosaur express."
Not only is that joke not funny, it barely even makes sense
Gee, Darren, get a hold of yourself. Try to contain your enthusiasm.
Congrats. I'll have to get a copy.
BTW, how did you come to write the book?
Awesome! And here I was just thinking it had been a while since I bought any new dinosaur books ...
Tetzoo is one of my favorite blogs, and you are among my all-time favorite authors of any genre.
It is so ordered.
I guess now it's time to start on "The Great Pterosaur Discoveries". Or "Ropens, Ahoy!"
What will become of the axed spreads? Might they appear here?
congrats on the new tome!
it looks beautiful and interesting, i'll keep an eye out for it here in chicagoland :)
And what's this about needing a phd to make sense of G Paul's book? the only part I didnt like was saying that the Protarchaeopteryx was an archeopterygian.
I love that. I have a copy.
I'm just so happy that pleurocoelus was changed to astrodon.
Just ordered my copy from amazon, will be a welcome addition to my library :-)
"And what's this about needing a phd to make sense of G Paul's book? the only part I didnt like was saying that the Protarchaeopteryx was an archeopterygian."
It was just a joke. I actually loved the book.
For example, pages 90-93 discuss the years 1960-1989, as though the next section of the book is dedicated to that era, and the very next page discusses Dilophosaurus, discovered in 1942
...and named in 1970.
"For example, pages 90-93 discuss the years 1960-1989, as though the next section of the book is dedicated to that era, and the very next page discusses Dilophosaurus, discovered in 1942"
"...and named in 1970."
... and only described in depth once Welles' classic monograph came out in 1984. So Dilophosaurus is quite relevent to the 70's and 80's.
Slightly off topic, but apparently there's a new, well-preserved specimen of Anchiornis, anybody got a picture of this bad boy?
Book taking ages to arrive in Germany... via Amazon. Argh. Very much looking forward to it.
Is there an interesting history behind why Dilophosaurus took 28 years to name? Was it originally identified as something else, or just stuck in a museum basement for ages?
I apologize for my ignorance!
Also, the new Anchiornis is over at Theropoda and Archosaur Musings. If anyone needs the paper, just ask!
"Is there an interesting history behind why Dilophosaurus took 28 years to name? Was it originally identified as something else, or just stuck in a museum basement for ages?"
It was originally described as as a new species of Megalosaurus, M. wetherelli. A decade later Welles returned to the Kayenta Formation and found a beautifully preserved skeleton, complete with a good skull that clearly showed crests - a feature lacking from the badly preserved type skull. This remains showed that the animal was a distinct genus.
Darren, congrats on the book. Hey, I was thinking, we need an Itunes for blogging- you should spend more time on the blog and charge people to subscribe or view articles or something. A Tetrapod Zoology Platinum Edition! (What I'm saying is nice hardcover books are out of my pricerange at the moment..)
The Anchiornis paper is open-access!!! Nature does that with some extra-spectacular papers. So, just go to http://www.nature.com/nature and download it.
It cannot sprawl.
Unless of course you eliminate all soft tissue from anywhere near the hip joint, take the head of the femur out of the acetabulum, and ram the dorsal surface of the femur against the acetabulum so that the trochanteric crest abuts against the dorsal rim of the acetabulum and the dorsal side of the head against the ventral rim.
...Which was in all seriousness proposed by one of the authors of Bambiraptor in his 2008 SVP meeting talk. TSIB.
The reasons for that are not terribly good, though.
The American variety of "Pleurocoelus" got changed to Paluxysaurus though.
Where on the Nature site is the Anchiornis paper?
...That's actually a very good question, because the paper is in the next issue (7264). Not only is it not there when I click on "Current Issue" (which is 7263 at the moment), but it's not in the Advance Online Publications either. I didn't notice because a direct link was posted on the DML; I have no idea how Dino Guy Ralph found that URL.
No idea where to find the supplementary information. I'll ask.
Of course, it's highly probable that everything will show up under "Current Issue" this Thursday.
The Texan one -- I'm not aware of anything found outside the US having been referred to Pleurocoelus.
There's a lot of tetrapod news popping out:
1) Algeripithecus was a lemur, not a monkey
2) Revised Cetartiodactyla phylogeny at PLosONE, placing Andrewsarchus next to SIamotherium and Entelodonts, and bizarrely "exploding" anthracothere-like animals monophyly.
> 2) Revised Cetartiodactyla phylogeny at PLosONE, placing
> Andrewsarchus next to SIamotherium and Entelodonts, and
> bizarrely "exploding" anthracothere-like animals monophyly.
They also find Perissodactyls inside what they simply call "a clade of ungulates", and Ferae as a sister group to that ungulate clade, see here: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0007…
Whatever happened to Pegasoferae :-0?!
Darren must have too many fans, Amazon just said mine isn't shipping of another 2 weeks.
"The lack of abundant support for either topology and the outstanding incongruence between data that fossilize and those that do not, suggests that many key fossils remain to be discovered"
Exactly...re Andy, we are still basing everything off the one skull. A cool article. I like their points about including appropriate outgroups and adequate character/intermediate taxon sampling..reminds me of the situation with the Archaea, wherein the DHVEG superclade requires the correct (Crenarchaeotal) outgroup and a long alignment to be a stable outgroup to Euryarchaeota..
And Mesonychians closer to Perissodactyles than to Artiodactyles; it's the Euungulata or Altungulata clade.
Well, nothing. Pegasoferae has never been found by a morphological analysis so far. And I predict that it won't be till -- at least! -- every single Paleogene eutherian is included in a data matrix that doesn't contain too many correlated characters.
"It cannot sprawl.
Unless of course you eliminate all soft tissue from anywhere near the hip joint, take the head of the femur out of the acetabulum, and ram the dorsal surface of the femur against the acetabulum so that the trochanteric crest abuts against the dorsal rim of the acetabulum and the dorsal side of the head against the ventral rim."
Tell it to Dave Hone. Because he has new, undescribed meterial that shows the Microraptor could sprawl. He has said said so on the Dinobase Public Forum. Seriously, tell him. :)
BTW, what ever happened to that Pristichampsus deal? Curiosity, ya knows :o)
...Yeah, sorry. When I was in Vienna, I had a lot less time than I had imagined. I'll look into it.
What isn't published has never happened. :-) I'll duly wait for the paper. Till then I'll continue to rely on the photos in Hwang et al. (2002).
"Yeah, sorry. When I was in Vienna, I had a lot less time than I had imagined. I'll look into it."
Sorry? No need to apologize when you did nothing.
"I'll duly wait for the paper."
Probably a good philosophy. Tom Holtz would be proud of you :)
My copy arrived today. It has the Triceratops jacket illustration, as shown on the Amazon page. For the Tsaagan photo I had to flip to page 122.
Amazon informs me:
" Darren Naish "The Great Dinosaur Discoveries"
Voraussichtliches Lieferdatum: November 03 2009"
A very popular book, it seems.
My copy arrived on Friday (from Amazon UK) and I've posted the following review there:
A new look at dinosaur discoveries
Darren Naish takes a different look at dinosaurs in this great new book. His novel approach (the clue is in the title) is to show some of the key discoveries of dinosaur fossils, and to explain the way these discoveries changed scientific understanding of these perennially fascinating animals.
This approach, rather than pouring scorn on the way our forebears "got it wrong", explains just why they thought the things they did, and puts their views into a framework of evolutionary science that itself has evolved over the past couple of centuries.
The book never talks down to the reader, being unafraid to use technical language where appropriate, and yet is accessible to the layman (such as myself) with only an amateur's understanding of the topic. All in all, I can't recommend it highly enough!
Darren, please fill in the blog's right side-bar with your "The Great Dinosaur Discoveries" cover icon [in "Other Information"]. I believe it could be a useful info for occasional blog-readers (and a permanent link to book sellers).
Surely you mean the left side bar? Apart from that, I agree.
And Darren, if/when you get busy with updating Tet Zoo's left side bar, could you also update your link to the Afarensis blog? (Afarensis is no longer hosted by ScienceBlogs.)
My blogroll is fucked, to put it mildly, and cannot be updated or modified without - LITERALLY - an entire day of pissing around. I have complained about it several times, will do so again now.
Have just wasted the past 30 mins adding the new little icon for The Great Dinosaur Discoveries - also not easy. But, thanks for suggestion: good idea. I have another new book out, but copies have yet to arrive.
Yes, I meant "left side-bar"...sorry!
I enjoyed The Hot-Blooded Dinosaurs and have been wondering what's happening with Dinosauria, if that taxon still exists, given the rate of discovery over the last 30 years while I was busy. The story of how our understanding developed is left out of scientific papers and Field Guides to the Dinosaurs. Thank you for telling the story.
I appreciate the illustrations. You've demonstrated on your blog that you can write coherently. This is going to the top of my wish list.
"It would seem that my new book is out." Aren't you jumping for joy? Pressing your nose into the pages and inhaling the smell of scholarship? Congratulations, Darren! And may your book compete successfully in the ecology of the marketplace.
1) British understatement.
2) Have a look at the left sidebar -- it's not his first book...
Darren - the black triceratops cover - is that a dustjacket, or are there two covers for the book?
Inquiring minds wanna know.
Hi: the US and UK editions both have totally different covers. I presume they're different with respect to spellings and such as well (but don't know, as I haven't seen a US version yet).
Mine finally arrived... its a very fine edition! Congrats! I've only read one chapter, but can already say that its engaging. Its also interesting to 'hear' out the difference in tone from your blog voice.
I ordered a copy last week and it arrived yesterday. Some great feathered dinosaur pictures among other delights, but I haven't had time to consume it yet.
As Darren indicates, there are errors, and the book could have used a little more proofreading. Apart from the Palaeozoic mess-up, though, all the errors I've noticed so far are grammatical. For example, a sentence on page eighteen reads, "In 1825 he named Iguanodon for these remains", which does not mean what it's supposed to mean. I would hypothesise that this originally read "he chose the name Iguanodon for these remains", but that "chose the name" was replaced with "named" in a hurried (and incautious) attempt to reduce the length of the text. Some other passages give me a similar impression.
I got your book for Christmas and read it. It is indeed an awesome book!
I finally got this book. Certainly a delight to read and a unique approach to dinosaurs.