Canada.com reports the firing of a government scientist because he wouldn't refer to the government as "Canada's New Government."
We could also file this as just another battle in the war on plain language.
The scientist was fired from an unpaid emeritus position, and is appealing his dismissal.
Update: And he was reinstated.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Someone finally did a review study on TV -- including "educational DVDs" -- and infants. Among results that should not surprise ...
Watching TV programmes or DVDs aimed at infants can actually delay language development, according to a number of studies. For example, a 2008 Thai study published in…
A few of you might remember Ward Churchill. He's the University of Colorado professor who caused a stink a few years ago with an essay that compared 9/11 victims in the World Trade Center to Nazis. His remarks generated a surge of demands that he be fired. Yesterday, he finally was - but not for…
Martin Gaskell, the astronomer who wasn't hired at the University of Kentucky (my words were chosen carefully; that really is the only 'crime' against him), has won an out-of-court settlement in his discrimination suit, and has gone on to give an interview which confirms my opinion of him: Kentucky…
There have been some interesting new developments in the study of the evolution of language. The idea that human language emerged from hand gestures rather than sounds has been getting very popular in recent years. Some scientists think that certain neurons in the brain played a crucial role in…
Wow. What a stupid thing to fire somebody for - a pissing match over plain language. Even for a pissing match this is pathetic.
I think "Blow it out your ass" would have been appropriate, though obviously dangerous for the career. I wonder what he said, exactly? I hate it when a detail is left out because it involved a "curse word" or it's not "politically correct."
Here's an update, Dr. Olikitch got his position back. It also quotes the so-called undiplomatic language:
http://www.nupge.ca/news_2006/n21se06a.htm
To even hint at this being evidence of some sort of "war on science" is just silly. It's got nothing to do with science at all.
"Bureaucratic overreaction" is a lot closer to the mark.
This may not be a full-blown war on science yet, but it has the potential to become the real deal. I was just complaining that these people follow me everywhere since the GOP gubanetorial candidate here in Michigan has been talking about getting creation back into the classroom. Now I'm applying for a job at the U of Alberta. Surely if I end up there the DI will declare Edmonton the new front in the international war on science. It's not paranoia if they're really following me.
Based on this incident? That's just wrong.
The "offending" comments had nothing to do with science and the reaction had nothing to do with science. The fact that it was a scientist who spoke up is absolutely irrelevant.
If it had happened in Canada Post, would the post have been headed, "War on Mail in Canada?"?
The concern is that scientific staff are being required to toe a political line.