even though the November election results produced a more moderate House, the Republican caucus went further to the right in selecting Neufeld, who was seen as the most conservative of the three speaker candidates, which included Mike O’Neal of Hutchinson and Kenny Wilk of Lansing. …
In 1994, Neufeld grabbed headlines when he was accused of blackmailing a legislator on a House vote by calling the legislator’s wife about allegations of sexual misconduct. Neufeld acknowledged making the call but said he wasn’t trying to blackmail anyone.
KS RINO helpfully dredges up the decision in Kansas v. Neufeld:
The defendant, Neufeld, is a Republican. Alldritt is a Democrat. Neufeld had been voting "Yes" on the omnibus [appropriations] bill and Alldritt had been voting "No" on the bill. According to Alldritt, Neufeld told him, "You're voting with us this time." Alldritt replied, "Excuse me?" Neufeld again stated, "You're voting with us this time. We know you were caught up in the [fifth floor] lounge in a compromising position with two [female] lobbyists earlier this evening. You're voting green or we'll call your wife." A green vote indicates a legislator is voting "Yes" on a bill. Alldritt testified that he considered Neufeld's statements a threat.Alldritt testified that he did not respond to the defendant's threat. Instead, Alldritt walked into the House chamber and called his wife to advise her of the threat. A short time later, a vote was taken on the appropriations bill and Alldritt voted "No." Alldritt testified he had no intention of changing his vote as a result of Neufeld's statement and he did not do so at any time. His intention at all times was to vote "No." …
At this time, Alldritt was seated at his desk on the House floor, and he received a phone call from Neufeld, who was seated at his desk on the House floor. According to Alldritt, the defendant stated, "This is Melvin. What's going on? Don't you--you're not voting right?" Alldritt replied that he was voting red and that he was not going to change his vote. Neufeld then stated, "Well, you know what this means." Alldritt replied, "Yeah, I know what this means," and hung up. …
Alldritt's wife, Carmen Alldritt, testified that she received a call from Neufeld shortly before midnight near the end of the legislative session. Neufeld told her that he was sorry to have to call and tell her that her husband's conduct was unbecoming of a member of the House of Representatives. He advised her that he was concerned about her marriage and her husband's conduct. Neufeld advised her that her husband had been seen in a lounge with two women employees who stood to benefit from the passage of the bill on which they were voting. Mrs. Alldritt responded, "What do you want me to do now, call my husband up to get him to change his vote?" Neufeld replied, "Well, yes."
…
after the legislative session had adjourned… Alldritt received a telephone call from Neufeld, who stated, "I'm calling to apologize. I did a really stupid thing. I'm a jerk and I hope you can forgive me." Alldritt's wife also received a telephone call from Neufeld at her office in Anthony. Neufeld stated, "I'm calling to apologize for my actions the other evening. I was a jerk. I was out of line. My friends know I can be kind of off-the-wall at times."
Diane has some fond memories of those days as well.
- Log in to post comments
Wow, I read the decision, and it seems like the court went through quite the mental gymnastics to NOT convict the guy of blackmail!! I probably don't have to ask, but how politically biased was the court at the time? Was that mostly a partisan decision?
So not only did this guy get re-elected (was this story ever really publicized?), but the repugs in the house feel justified in naming him speaker?
Apparently all the talk of personal accountability, ethical responsibility, and values only applies to the other guy, or during campaign speeches.
I'm just stunned.