Climate looniness

The House Science Committee held a historic hearing on the IPCC report and the status of climate change (link to RealPlayer video of the hearing). It was especially historic because Speaker Pelosi made it the first committee she testified before as Speaker. She expressed her concerns about climate change, and the concerns she's heard from many others.

The hearing continued for over three hours, with a panel of experts occupying most of the time. The panel consisted of climate scientists who had contributed and edited portions of the IPCC report and the Summary for Policy Makers recently released. Chris Mooney covered the hearing for Seed magazine.

But what I want to talk about is not the excellent testimony offered, but the concluding remarks by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher. He had aggressively questioned on witness, pushing a fairly irrelevant question about what fraction of carbon dioxide in the air comes from natural sources, then ignoring the answers he got. In his concluding remarks, he observed that carbon dioxide levels have fluctuated throughout the Earth's history.

"We don't know what those other cycles were caused by in the past," Representative Rohrabacher speculated, "it could be dinosaur flatulence."

No one laughed. Rohrabacher was unable to bring any witnesses who could defend that claim, or indeed any climate change deniers at all.

More like this

Why do House global warming hearings draw so many more people than Senate hearings? I don't know, but I arrived late today to Capitol Hill and so spent half of my time listening to the House Science and Technology Committee hearing on the new IPCC report in an overflow room. (I didn't try at…
Last week, House Representative Lamar Smith held yet another masturbatory hearing to promote climate science denial. Smith is bought and paid for by Big Oil, so that is the most obvious reason he and his Republican colleagues would put on such a dog and pony show, complete with a chorus of three…
Last month I wrote about how junkscience.com and The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition were fronts set up by tobacco companies to oppose regulatioon of smoking. Chris Mooney published a very interesting article in the Washington Post on the use of the phrase "sound science" by other industry…
Well, as usual, there's much to say about the latest House hearing on political interferences with climate science. Beforehand, I had the honor of meeting Rep. Brad Miller, who's been a pioneer on this issue. For me, that was probably the highlight of the hearing. Miller was a nice, very personable…

If only someone had the gonads to say "The only flatulance around here is coming from you lips, Dana". I would say it, but of course that is why I am proabably not electable..

Rohrabacher was unable to bring any witnesses who could defend that claim, or indeed any climate change deniers at all.

Does this mean "Rohrabacher was not allowed to bring climate change deniers as witnesses" or "Rohrabacher did not bother attempting to call any climate change deniers as witnesses"?

He had the opportunity, but either couldn't get his crap together, or didn't want to.

Apparently he thought about inviting someone from the Chamber of Commerce, but realized it would look silly seating a businessman next to several climate scientists.

Apparently he doesn't know the difference between carbon dioxide and methane, either. Dino farts, indeed.

Looks like Rohrabacher might have been correct in his comment about dinosaur gas becuase a scientist at this year's American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting has suggested just such a thing:
newsminer.com/bookmark/10721028-Gaseous-dinosaurs-that-âmight-have-contributedâ-to-global-warming

And why isn't it funny when greens say cow flatulence could be contributing to AGW?