GOP strategy: stop the vote

Despite Tony's endorsement, I'm not loving Stay Red Kansas. Tony thinks it's written by insiders, but I see a lot of juvenile errors, and I almost suspect that it's a new venture by the gang from Fire Kansas Democrats. The mistakes they make are basic, like claiming that the RNC would kick in funds for a Senate race, when the National Republican Senate Campaign would do that.

One thing that isn't juvenile is their distaste for voting:

In fact, the voting process is so ridiculously unregulated in our humble state of Kansas, that so long as a name, address and birth date are memorized, you can waltz right in and pull a lever however you may choose. Sad, but oh so true.

Why is this sad? It isn't clear. In the one election close enough that vote fraud might have interfered with the result, there was a long court case which ultimately concluded, in SRK's words "There were two instances of illegal votes that were ultimately dismissed by a Johnson County Judge for their lack of validity." That's it.

Vote suppression is a standard part of the GOP platform. Requiring voters to show ID at the polling place and making it harder to register to vote are sadly reminiscent of the poll tax and Jim Crow laws which disenfranchised racial minorities and poor voters in general, in the old South.

SRK writes:

Sadly, there are a plethora of media personalities that have entered into personal crusades designed to give anyone and everyone an opportunity to cast a ballot

Horrors! When will we learn from our Republican masters that the vote is only for people who look like SRK?

In any event, don't forget to vote today. It'll piss off a Republican.

More like this

I'm a fan of ACORN, and have been for a long time. I gave to them after Hurricane Katrina, to help the New Orleans-based anti-poverty group rebuild itself and its city. I gave again last winter as I was making my end-of-year charitable donations. I like them because they work hard for working…
Voting is not party involvement. We hear a lot of talk these days about "voters" being repressed in their attempt to be involved in the Democratic primary process. There may be something to that, and it might be nice to make it easier for people to wake up on some (usually) Tuesday morning and go…
I haven't written much about Jim Slattery's race to replace Memory Pills Roberts. Not because it isn't an interesting race, just because I haven't had much to say. Slattery knows Kansas and is experienced at winning elections there, Roberts has done a crappy job, and I hope Slattery wins. For…
Anderson: Poll shows Barnett not a household name - CJOnline Blogs: Overall, only one of the 10 people I approached this week in downtown Topeka for a random political poll could correctly identify Barnett as the Republican candidate for Kansas governor. Five said they'd never heard of him. Four…

None of their outlandish calims are ever supported with evidence, they often repeat rumor as fact, and GOD!, the typos!

We hear it's Scott Paradise (of FDK) newest venture.

Josh, how juveline in your retort.

The R.N.C. is responsible for many, many things.

First, the R.N.C. is given the responsibility of investing in state parties as they see fit. This includes independent expenditures on behalf of individual candidates, advertising purchased on behalf of the state's party, and yes, reconstructing said state parties. They can do all of that, and they do so quite frequently.

Secondly, as you saw in the 2008 elections, the R.N.C. will enter targeted Senate and House races as they see fit. For example, the R.N.C. dumped over ten millions dollars into races in Missouri, Ohio, Rhode Island and Tennessee. The money was spent entirely on the United States Senate races during the campaign's final months.

By Kansas Conservative (not verified) on 27 Feb 2007 #permalink

Indeed, but in a Presidential year, I would expect the NRSC to handle most of that sort of work, especially in a relatively safe state like Kansas.