Copyright is broken

In a world in which public domain speeches by government officials on government time are copyrighted, it's hard to conclude anything other than that copyright is broken.

If it is not "fair use" to present film shot by CSPAN's cameras of congresscritters at work for educational purposes and with attribution, copyright is broken.

Historically, the idea was that works were in the public domain unless Congress, exercising a right granted by the US Constitution in order "to promote the progress of science and useful arts," grants a copyright, patent or trademark. In our age of corporate mass media, content producers like Disney have worked hard to reverse this equation, making restrictions on copying the default, with public domain occupying a rare and special status.

The consequences of that are far-reaching. I casually quoted the Constitution above, and I could sell materials which casually quote the Bible, Shakespeare, the Federalist Papers or Mark Twain. But if the same document contained an image of Mickey Mouse, or quoted the "I Have a Dream" speech, or a chunk of Porgy and Bess, I could be in trouble. The copyright on those works have been extended every time they get close to expiring. "Oh! Susannah" belongs to all Americans, not just Stephen Foster, and in any just world, so would Gershwin's "Summertime." That is what "public domain" means.

Fortunately, Congress is slowly moving to restore some balance. It won't end the copyrights on century-old works, but the FAIR USE Act would at least clarify the right to quote from a copyrighted work for purposes of journalism, criticism, commentary and research. I can't say whether that would put the Speaker's use of CSPAN's clips back in the clear, but I hope so.

More like this

My Scibling Shelley has gotten into and out of a bit of fuss while I've been incommunicado. She posted about a paper discussing the role of alcohol in protecting antioxidants in fruit. As so many of us have done, she posted a graph and table from the original paper to illustrate her description…
Jeffrey Toobin, writing in the New Yorker, has an excellent article on Google's plan to scan all the books they can get their hands on into digital: The legal assertion at the core of Google's business plan is its purported right to scan millions of copyrighted books without payment to or…
In the comments on my DMCA post, a reader asked me to comment on this piece of silliness. I try not to disappoint my readers, so here's my take. It's a pile of silliness with the distinct aroma of astrotur - silliness mixed with a bit of deliberate stupidity in order to obscure things. The basic…
There's an interesting tweet about attribution in the data web. And it raises a tension I run into a lot but haven't seen a lot written about: the shifting nature of what the word "attribution" means. We have a fairly common understanding of attribution in our daily lives: credit where credit is…

Hear hear! I'm 100% with you on this one.

I will probably blog on this myself shortly as inspiration strikes.

Have you read "Free Culture" by Lessig?

-Rob

I haven't read the book, but I'm a big fan of his blog and a lot of the work he's done in court.