Endosymbiosis in process

Reposted from the old blog.

Cells-ViLast week we discussed endosymbiosis, the hypothesis that mitochondria and chloroplasts originated as free-living bacteria captured by another cell and essentially enslaved.

This week's Science has evidence of this process at work today. A Secondary Symbiosis in Progress? -- Okamoto and Inouye 310 (5746): 287 -- Science.

The figure labeled A shows the normal adult Hatena. It has a flagellum, an eyespot (the arrow), and all that green chlorophyll. Turns out, as shown in figure B, the eyespot is inherited by only one daughter cell, as is the green. All that stuff is from a symbiont living within the cell. The DNA in the symbiont shows that it's a member of the genus Nephroselmis. The free living form of the symbiont has morphological differences from the symbiont, but it's abundant where the host occurs.

The eyespot helps the organism move into the light, meaning that the host's movement is controlled by signals from the symbiont.

When the cell divides, one side has the symbiont, the other has a very different morphology. It has a feeding apparatus where the symbiont would be if it had one, and is predatory. As it hunts for food, if it picks up a Nephroselmis, it doesn't digest it, but integrates it into the host. When the wrong strain of symbiont is ingested, it is not digested, but it also doesn't go through the morphological changes.

Figure D shows the life cycle, which I'll let the discoverers describe:

First, a green cell (step a) divides (b) into one green (c) and one colorless (d) cell. The colorless cell develops a feeding apparatus de novo (d to e) and engulfs a Nephroselmis (e to g). The symbiont plastid develops and the feeding apparatus degenerates (g to a). As we never observed any dividing cell without a symbiont (d) or with an "immature" plastid (h), symbiont acquisition and modification apparently occur within one generation. How many generations the symbiont persists is an open question.

As they say:

Hatena represents an early stage in the development of an ongoing secondary endosymbiosis.

Secondary symbiosis because the symbiont is a cell with chloroplasts in it.

These two organisms illustrate one step in a process which would ultimately lead to organisms like the Euglena, which has a persistent secondary symbiosis. It's chloroplasts can be killed off, leaving the organism to hunt for food. The symbiont can regrow under better conditions. Each symbiont has double membranes, rather than a single membrane, indicating that the original symbiont (probably a kinetoplastid) was ingested by the ancestral euglenophyte. At this stage in Hatena's development, the symbiont doesn't divide in synchrony with the host, but that synchrony can evolve, just as the host-symbiont specificity has evolved already.

This is evolution at work, even if it's not quite neo-Darwinian. (By which I mean, it does not involve only natural selection, mutation, gene flow and genetic drift. It's still Darwinian, and involves no magic.)

More like this

The prisoner was plucked from a free-living existence and plunged, without trial, into a cell from which it will never leave. It will be provided with food but will have to cater to the needs of its jailer, bereft of its own independence. And yet, this apparent injustice will go unchallenged. No…
As Lynn Margulis elegantly explained, some eukaryotic organelles -- such as mitochondria and chloroplasts -- are the product of an ancient endosymbiosis event. Free living prokaryotes were absorbed by primitive eukaryotes and, over many generations, become entangled in an obligate host-symbiont…
Symbiosis is everywhere. From the Greek for "living with," symbiosis is simply a close association between two different species in nature. These relationships can be mutualistic, parasitic, or somewhere in between. Bacterial symbionts live inside bodies, like the bacteria that help us and other…
Multiple foundress queens of Acromyrmex versicolor atop their shared fungus garden. A striking result from recent studies on the co-evolution of leafcutter ants and their fungus is that the two lineages do not show a tight pattern of coevolution.  That is, the evolutionary relationships among the…