As fair a definition as any of Newtonism.
I think that we can probably fit Intelligent Vacuuming into the "big tent" of Intelligent Falling. Questions about whether objects are pushed or pulled can safely be left until after we destroy the naturalism of modern physics, and replace it with a theistic science.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
I'm writing this at an altitude of 37,000 feet, 7 miles up in the air. Now I'm not really afraid of flying — I am entirely confident that I'll be able to post this sometime after I land — but if you think about it, it's grounds for trepidation. This is insanely high, and I'm in this fragile tin can…
A repost of a Wikipedia approved classic, from the old TfK.
it's only a theory...: On the Shoulders of Giant Mistakes...:
Consider the following excerpt from a letter written by Isaac Newton to Reverend Dr. Richard Bentley in 1692, in which he describes some of the implications of his Law of…
Reposted from the old TfK.
I say no, Bill Dembski says yes:
Despite intelligent design's clear linkage, both methodologically and in content, with existing sciences that sift the effects of intelligence from undirected natural forces, critics of intelligent design often label it a form of…
Casey Luskin is back with a brand new dance, a tap dance around all those pesky little previous statements by ID advocates that come back to haunt them every time they try and claim that the "intelligent designer" doesn't have to be supernatural. He's complaining that a news article referred to the…
There's a gravity shortage, we've all got to do what we can.