Allelopathic interactions?

i-30423e01e6dc7a1e2d8c89b4afa335ce-200803031550.jpg

Via the Columbia Stats blog, we learn that there is a strong negative relationship between the number of Starbucks per capita and the number of Walmarts per capita. This isn't surprising, but it is informative. It also means that people who don't like expensive coffee or cheap Chinese crap should all move to Vermont.

Failing that, New Jersey or Rhode Island look to be islands of sanity. It is worth noting that Rhode Island is also one of the few states in which NCSE has not tracked any creationist activity over the last few years, suggesting that it has a very strong claim to sanity.

I invite speculation about possible causes for this remarkable relationship. My suggestion, in the title, is that Walmarts somehow poison the ground, preventing successful Starbucks colonization. Or vice versa.

Tags

More like this

Why should government welfare mean less religion?: This was a question that Anthony Gill and Erik Lundsgaarde tackled by in 2004. They analysed the data from a range of countries, and found that the greater proportion of GDP that was spent on government welfare, the more non-religious people there…
There's been much ink spilled lately about the latest work from the authors of Freakonomics. I should say before getting into this that I haven't read their last book, and don't plan to read the sequel. I also haven't read any of Malcolm Gladwell's books, for largely the same reasons (note that…
This has been out for a little while now, and Chris has been promoting it very heavily, and it's sort of interesting to see the reactions. It's really something of a Rorschach blot of a book, with a lot of what's been written about it telling you more about what the writer wants to be in the book…
In regards to the title, in a word, I don't think so. More on that later. Nationally the exit polls suggest that these are results for Barack Obama broken down by "Size of Place": Urban: 63% Suburban: 50% Rural: 45% There's a rather clear relationship here whereby Obama's vote totals in urban…

Starbuck's originated in Seattle.
So did the Disco Institute.

Coincidence? I think not!

By T. Bruce McNeely (not verified) on 03 Mar 2008 #permalink

Hmm...in the last couple years we have seen a four-fold increase in Starbucks density. Does that mean that we will get rid of some of our Walmarts?

As a Starbucks fan and Walmart foe, who just took a job in NY: I'm very happy! but apparently Seattle would be better. Hmm.

Maybe caffeine sensitizes the skin to toxic waste in Chinese-made crap? :)

Darn, I just moved out of Rhode Island too. I guess I missed my opportunity to put a blip on the NCSE screen for Creationist activity. Maybe I should have started a club or something. Eh, too late now.

z.

By scott zeilenga (not verified) on 03 Mar 2008 #permalink

You all are joking, right? Look at which states are where. Wal-mart originated in the South. Starbucks originated on the West Coast. Both have a larger number of stores closest to their point of origin and fewer as you get farther away. This is a great example of how an apparent statistical relationship can be understood in a whole new light when more factors are considered.